Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Ford Focus 2004 fuel consumption

Ford Focus from 2004 to 2008 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 18% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 16% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 19% higher. Starting from 2004 Ford Focus average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2008 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersFord FocusAll carmakersFord Focus
2004+7%+17% +9%+17%
Show all years
2005+8%+17% +10%+17%
2006+9%+17% +11%+17%
2007+11%+17% +12%+17%
2008+12%+17% +13%+17%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford Focus.

2004 - 2008

Ford Focus 2004 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines32.1 MPG
7.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines27.3 MPG
8.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+18%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines45.8 MPG
5.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines39.1 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+17%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford Focus 2004 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.8 liters per 100 km or 13% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford Focus with automatic transmission consumes around 1.2 litres per 100 km or 16% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Ford Focus advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Ford Focus 2004 2.0 16V 145 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Ford Focus 2004 1.4 16V 80 HP manual 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+15%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Ford Focus 2004 1.6 16V 100 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+13%
Ford Focus 2004 1.6 16V 100 HP automatic 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km+21%
Ford Focus 2004 1.6 16V Ti-VCT 115 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+23%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Ford Focus 2004 1.6 TDCi 90 HP manual 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+19%
Ford Focus 2004 1.6 TDCi 109 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km+19%
Ford Focus 2004 1.6 TDCi 109 HP automatic 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+16%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Ford Focus 2006 1.8 125 HP manual 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+17%
1.8 liter diesel engine
Ford Focus 2005 1.8 TDCi 115 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+17%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Ford Focus 2004 2.0 16V 145 HP manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+15%
Ford Focus 2005 2.0 16V 145 HP automatic 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+19%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Ford Focus 2004 2.0 TDCi 136 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+15%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Ford Focus 2005 2.5 20V Turbo ST 225 HP manual 25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
21.8 MPG
10.8 l/100km+16%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.