Ford Galaxy 2010 fuel consumption

Ford Galaxy from 2010 to 2015 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 16% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 15% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 18% higher. Starting from 2010 Ford Galaxy average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2013 it was slightly above industry average, at 2014 difference became similar to average and finally at 2015 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

Year	Gasoline cars		Diesel cars
Year	All carmakers	Ford Galaxy	All carmakers	Ford Galaxy
2010	+16%	+27%	+16%	+26%
Show all years
2011	+19%	+27%	+19%	+26%
2012	+21%	+27%	+23%	+26%
2013	+23%	+27%	+27%	+26%
2014	+26%	+27%	+30%	+26%
2015	+27%	+27%	+33%	+26%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford Galaxy.

2010 - 2015

Ford Galaxy 2010 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	30.0 MPG 7.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	24.4 MPG 9.7 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+26%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	38.9 MPG 6.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+25%

Ford Galaxy 2010 specs Ford Galaxy 2010 owner reviews

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford Galaxy 2010 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford Galaxy with automatic transmission consumes around 0.8 litres per 100 km or 10% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Ford Galaxy fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 TDCi 163 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Ford Galaxy 2010 1.6 16v EcoBoost 160 HP manual	32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km	25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km+28%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 16v 145 HP manual	28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km
Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 16v EcoBoost 203 HP automatic	29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km	23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km+25%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 TDCi 140 HP manual	41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km+25%
Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 TDCi 140 HP automatic	39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km	30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km+27%
Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 TDCi 163 HP manual	41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km+25%
Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 TDCi 163 HP automatic	39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km	29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+33%
2.2 liter diesel engine
Ford Galaxy 2010 2.2 TDCi 200 HP manual	34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km	29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+18%
Ford Galaxy 2011 2.2 TDC 200 HP automatic		26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km

Do you own a Ford Galaxy? Please share your fuel economy!

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.