Ford Mondeo 2007 fuel consumption

Ford Mondeo from 2007 to 2010 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 13% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 12% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 14% higher. Starting from 2007 Ford Mondeo average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2008 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

Year	Gasoline cars		Diesel cars
Year	All carmakers	Ford Mondeo	All carmakers	Ford Mondeo
2007	+11%	+12%	+12%	+11%
Show all years
2008	+12%	+12%	+13%	+10%
2009	+14%	+12%	+14%	+10%
2010	+16%	+12%	+16%	+10%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford Mondeo.

2007 - 2010

Ford Mondeo 2007 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	27.8 MPG 8.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	24.9 MPG 9.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+12%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	36.3 MPG 6.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+10%

Ford Mondeo 2007 specs Ford Mondeo 2007 owner reviews

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford Mondeo 2007 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.2 liters per 100 km or 20% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford Mondeo with automatic transmission consumes around 0.8 litres per 100 km or 12% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Ford Mondeo fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Ford Mondeo 2007 Wagon 2.0 16V 145 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford Mondeo with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford Mondeo 2007 Wagon 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp 140 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 Wagon 1.6 16V 125 HP manual	31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+18%
1.8 liter diesel engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 Wagon 1.8 TDCi 125 HP manual	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km	36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+10%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 Wagon 2.0 16V 145 HP manual	29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+10%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 Wagon 2.0 TDCi 130 Hp 130 HP automatic	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km	30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km+10%
Ford Mondeo 2007 Wagon 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp 140 HP manual	39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km	35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km+14%
Ford Mondeo 2008 Wagon 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp Automatic 140 HP automatic	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km	31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+6%
2.3 liter petrol engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 Wagon 2.3 16V 161 HP automatic	25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km	22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km+13%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 Wagon 2.5 20V 220 HP manual	25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km	23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km+6%

Do you own a Ford Mondeo? Please share your fuel economy!

2007 - 2010

Ford Mondeo 2007 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	24.9 MPG 9.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+11%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	36.3 MPG 6.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+10%

Ford Mondeo 2007 specs Ford Mondeo 2007 owner reviews

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Ford Mondeo fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 16V 145 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford Mondeo with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp 140 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 1.6 16V 125 HP manual	31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+18%
1.8 liter diesel engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 1.8 TDCi 125 HP manual	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km	36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+10%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 16V 145 HP manual	29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+10%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 TDCi 130 Hp 130 HP automatic	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km	30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km+10%
Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp 140 HP manual	39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km	35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km+14%
Ford Mondeo 2008 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp Automatic 140 HP automatic	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km	31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+6%
2.3 liter petrol engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 2.3 16V 161 HP automatic		22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km
2.5 liter petrol engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 2.5 20V 220 HP manual	25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km	23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km+6%

Do you own a Ford Mondeo? Please share your fuel economy!

2007 - 2010

Ford Mondeo 2007 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	27.8 MPG 8.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	24.9 MPG 9.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+12%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	36.6 MPG 6.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+10%

Ford Mondeo 2007 specs Ford Mondeo 2007 owner reviews

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Ford Mondeo fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 16V 145 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford Mondeo with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp 140 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 1.6 16V 125 HP manual	31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+18%
1.8 liter diesel engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 1.8 TDCi 125 HP manual	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km	36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+10%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 16V 145 HP manual	29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+10%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 TDCi 130 Hp 130 HP automatic	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km	30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km+10%
Ford Mondeo 2007 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp 140 HP manual	39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km	35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km+14%
Ford Mondeo 2008 2.0 TDCi 140 Hp Automatic 140 HP automatic	33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km	31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+6%
2.2 liter diesel engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 2.2 TDCi 175 HP manual	37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km
2.3 liter petrol engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 2.3 16V 161 HP automatic	25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km	22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km+13%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Ford Mondeo 2007 2.5 20V 220 HP manual	25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km	23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km+6%

Do you own a Ford Mondeo? Please share your fuel economy!

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.