Ford Mustang 2005 fuel consumption
Ford Mustang from 2005 to 2009 real fuel consumption according to user reports is similar compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2005 the Ford Mustang average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Ford Mustang | |||
| 2005 | +8% | +4% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2006 | +9% | +4% | ||
| 2007 | +11% | +4% | ||
| 2008 | +12% | +4% | ||
| 2009 | +14% | +4% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford Mustang.
2005 - 2009
Ford Mustang 2005 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 19.7 MPG 11.9 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Mustang 2005 V 4.0 i V6 12V 212 HP manual | 22.6 MPG 10.4 l/100km |
21.8 MPG 10.8 l/100km+4% |
| 4.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Mustang 2005 V 4.6 i V8 GT 304 HP manual | 18.1 MPG 13.0 l/100km |
|
| Ford Mustang 2008 Bullitt 4.6 V8 315 HP manual | 18.1 MPG 13.0 l/100km |
|
| 5.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Mustang 2006 Shelby GT500 5.4 500 HP manual | 20.3 MPG 11.6 l/100km |
|
| Ford Mustang 2008 Shelby GT500KR 5.4 540 HP manual | 20.3 MPG 11.6 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.