Ford Probe fuel consumption
Of all Ford Probe modifications produced from 1989 to 1997 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 4% higher compared to advertised consumption. Starting from 1993 Ford Probe average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 1997 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became significantly higher than average. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Ford Probe | |||
| 1993 | +5% | +9% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 1994 | +6% | +9% | ||
| 1995 | +5% | +9% | ||
| 1996 | +4% | +9% | ||
| 1997 | +3% | +9% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford Probe.
1993 - 1997
Ford Probe 1993 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 26.3 MPG 9.0 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +4% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Probe 1993 2.0 16V 118 HP manual | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km+9% |
| 2.5 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Probe 1994 2.5 24V 164 HP manual | 23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km |
23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km0% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.