Ford Ranger 2006 fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Diesel cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Ford Ranger | |||
| 2006 | +11% | +6% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2007 | +12% | +6% | ||
| 2008 | +13% | +6% | ||
| 2009 | +14% | +6% | ||
| 2010 | +16% | +6% | ||
| 2011 | +19% | +6% | ||
| 2012 | +23% | +6% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford Ranger.
Ford Ranger 2006 Double Cab fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 23.9 MPG 9.8 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +6% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford Ranger 2006 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.5 liters per 100 km or 17% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Ford Ranger fuel economy is one of the worst.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5 liter diesel engine | ||
| Ford Ranger 2006 Double Cab 2.5 TDCi RWD 143 HP manual | 25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km |
|
| Ford Ranger 2006 XL 2.5 TDCi 4WD 143 HP manual | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km+6% |
| Ford Ranger 2010 Double Cab 2.5 TDi 143 HP 4x4 automatic | 22.6 MPG 10.4 l/100km |
|
| 3.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Ford Ranger 2006 3.0 TDCi Automatic 4x4 156 HP automatic | 23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km |
|
Ford Ranger 2006 Regular Cab fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | insignificant |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford Ranger 2006 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.5 liters per 100 km or 6% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 3.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Ford Ranger 2006 Grew Cab 3.0 TDCi 156 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5 liter diesel engine | ||
| Ford Ranger 2006 Grew Cab 2.5 TDCi 143 HP manual | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km+6% |
| Ford Ranger 2006 XL 2.5 TDCi 4WD 143 HP manual | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km+6% |
| Ford Ranger 2006 Grew Cab 2.5 TDCi 4x4 143 HP manual | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km+6% |
| 3.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Ford Ranger 2006 3.0 TDCi Automatic 156 HP automatic | 23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km |
|
| Ford Ranger 2006 3.0 TDCi Automatic 4x4 156 HP automatic | 23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km |
|
| Ford Ranger 2006 Grew Cab 3.0 TDCi 156 HP manual | 25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km |
24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km+3% |
| Ford Ranger 2006 Grew Cab 3.0 TDCi 4x4 156 HP manual | 23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km |
22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km+4% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.