Ford Scorpio 1994 fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Ford Scorpio | |||
| 1994 | +6% | +9% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 1995 | +5% | +9% | ||
| 1996 | +4% | +8% | ||
| 1997 | +3% | +5% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford Scorpio.
Ford Scorpio 1994 sedan fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 22.9 MPG 10.3 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +5% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford Scorpio 1994 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 6% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford Scorpio with automatic transmission consumes around 0.7 litres per 100 km or 7% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Ford Scorpio advertised fuel economy is slightly worse than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is among the 20% worst in its class.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Ford Scorpio 1994 2.0i 115 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford Scorpio with 2.9 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Ford Scorpio 1995 2.9i 150 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Scorpio 1994 2.0i 115 HP manual | 23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km |
24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km-1% |
| Ford Scorpio 1994 2.0i 16V 136 HP manual | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km+11% |
| Ford Scorpio 1994 2.0i 16V 136 HP automatic | 25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km |
22.0 MPG 10.7 l/100km+16% |
| 2.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Scorpio 1996 2.3i 16V 147 HP manual | 24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km |
22.0 MPG 10.7 l/100km+11% |
| Ford Scorpio 1996 2.3i 16V 147 HP automatic | 22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km |
21.0 MPG 11.2 l/100km+7% |
| 2.5 liter diesel engine | ||
| Ford Scorpio 1994 2.5 TD 116 HP manual | 28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km |
|
| 2.9 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Scorpio 1995 2.9i 150 HP automatic | 21.2 MPG 11.1 l/100km |
|
| Ford Scorpio 1994 2.9i 24V 207 HP automatic | 18.7 MPG 12.6 l/100km |
17.6 MPG 13.4 l/100km+6% |
Ford Scorpio 1994 wagon fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +3% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Ford Scorpio 1994 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.5 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford Scorpio with automatic transmission consumes around 0.7 litres per 100 km or 7% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Ford Scorpio advertised fuel economy is slightly worse than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is among the 20% worst in its class.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Ford Scorpio 1994 Wagon 2.0i 115 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford Scorpio with 2.9 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Ford Scorpio 1995 Wagon 2.9i 150 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Scorpio 1994 Wagon 2.0i 115 HP manual | 23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km |
24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km-3% |
| Ford Scorpio 1994 Wagon 2.0i 16V 136 HP manual | 25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km |
24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km+8% |
| Ford Scorpio 1994 Wagon 2.0i 16V 136 HP automatic | 25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km |
22.0 MPG 10.7 l/100km+14% |
| 2.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Scorpio 1996 Wagon 2.3i 16V 147 HP manual | 23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km |
22.0 MPG 10.7 l/100km+6% |
| Ford Scorpio 1996 Wagon 2.3i 16V 147 HP automatic | 22.0 MPG 10.7 l/100km |
21.0 MPG 11.2 l/100km+5% |
| 2.5 liter diesel engine | ||
| Ford Scorpio 1994 Wagon 2.5 TD 116 HP manual | 27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km |
|
| 2.9 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Scorpio 1995 Wagon 2.9i 150 HP automatic | 20.8 MPG 11.3 l/100km |
|
| Ford Scorpio 1994 Wagon 2.9i 24V 207 HP automatic | 18.4 MPG 12.8 l/100km |
17.6 MPG 13.4 l/100km+5% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.