Ford Sierra 1990 fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Ford Sierra | All carmakers | Ford Sierra | |
| 1990 | +5% | +12% | +5% | +6% |
| Show all years | ||||
| 1991 | +5% | +12% | +4% | +6% |
| 1992 | +5% | +12% | +2% | +6% |
| 1993 | +5% | +11% | +3% | +6% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Ford Sierra.
Ford Sierra 1990 hatchback fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +10% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +6% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, Ford Sierra 1990 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford Sierra with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 5% less fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Ford Sierra fuel economy is slightly better than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Ford Sierra 1990 2.0i 120 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford Sierra with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Ford Sierra 1990 2.0 105 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Sierra 1990 1.6 71 HP manual | 29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
|
| Ford Sierra 1990 1.6i 80 HP manual | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km+16% |
| 1.8 liter diesel engine | ||
| Ford Sierra 1990 1.8 TD 75 HP manual | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+6% |
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Sierra 1990 2.0 105 HP manual | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
|
| Ford Sierra 1990 2.0i 120 HP manual | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km+10% |
| Ford Sierra 1990 2.0i 120 HP automatic | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km+5% |
| Ford Sierra 1990 2.0i 4x4 120 HP manual | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km+10% |
| 2.9 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Sierra 1990 2.9i 4x4 146 HP manual | 20.3 MPG 11.6 l/100km |
|
Ford Sierra 1990 wagon fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.9 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +10% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +6% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, Ford Sierra 1990 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford Sierra with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 5% less fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Ford Sierra advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Ford Sierra 1990 Stationwagon 2.0i 120 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford Sierra with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Ford Sierra 1990 Stationwagon 2.0i 4x4 120 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Sierra 1990 Stationwagon 1.6 71 HP manual | 29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km |
|
| Ford Sierra 1990 Stationwagon 1.6i 80 HP manual | 27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km |
24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km+12% |
| 1.8 liter diesel engine | ||
| Ford Sierra 1990 Stationwagon 1.8 TD 75 HP manual | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+6% |
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Sierra 1990 Stationwagon 2.0 105 HP manual | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
|
| Ford Sierra 1990 Stationwagon 2.0i 120 HP manual | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km+12% |
| Ford Sierra 1990 Stationwagon 2.0i 120 HP automatic | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km+6% |
| Ford Sierra 1990 Stationwagon 2.0i 4x4 120 HP manual | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km+12% |
Ford Sierra 1990 sedan fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 24.6 MPG 9.6 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +14% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +6% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, Ford Sierra 1990 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Ford Sierra with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 5% less fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Ford Sierra advertised fuel economy is slightly better than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Ford Sierra 1990 2.0i 120 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Ford Sierra with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Ford Sierra 1990 2.0 105 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Sierra 1990 1.6 71 HP manual | 29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
|
| Ford Sierra 1990 1.6i 80 HP manual | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km+16% |
| 1.8 liter diesel engine | ||
| Ford Sierra 1990 1.8 TD 75 HP manual | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+6% |
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Ford Sierra 1990 2.0 105 HP manual | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km+25% |
| Ford Sierra 1990 2.0i 120 HP manual | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km+10% |
| Ford Sierra 1990 2.0i 120 HP automatic | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km+5% |
| Ford Sierra 1990 2.0 Cosworth 4x4 220 HP manual | 22.2 MPG 10.6 l/100km |
19.4 MPG 12.1 l/100km+14% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.