Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Jaguar F-Type 2017 fuel consumption

Jaguar F-Type from 2017 to 2019 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 26% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2017 the Jaguar F-Type average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersJaguar F-Type
2017+28%+29%
Show all years
2018+28%+29%
2019+27%+29%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Jaguar F-Type.

2017 - 2019

Jaguar F-Type 2017 coupe fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+32%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Jaguar F-Type 2017 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.3 liters per 100 km or 13% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Jaguar F-Type advertised fuel economy is among the 20% worst in its class, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is one of the worst.
Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Jaguar F-Type with 5.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Jaguar F-Type 2017 5.0 AWD 550 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
3.0 liter petrol engine
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 340 HP manual 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 340 HP automatic 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+18%
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 380 HP manual 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 380 HP automatic 27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
19.3 MPG
12.2 l/100km+42%
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 AWD 380 HP automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
19.3 MPG
12.2 l/100km+37%
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 400 HP automatic 27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 AWD 400 HP automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
5.0 liter petrol engine
Jaguar F-Type 2017 5.0 AWD 550 HP automatic 20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km
2017 - 2019

Jaguar F-Type 2017 cabrio fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+26%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Jaguar F-Type 2017 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.3 liters per 100 km or 13% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Jaguar F-Type fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 3.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 340 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Jaguar F-Type with 5.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Jaguar F-Type 2017 5.0 AWD 550 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
3.0 liter petrol engine
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 340 HP manual 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 340 HP automatic 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km+14%
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 380 HP manual 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 380 HP automatic 27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km+31%
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 AWD 380 HP automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km+31%
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 400 HP automatic 27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
Jaguar F-Type 2017 3.0 AWD 400 HP automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
5.0 liter petrol engine
Jaguar F-Type 2017 5.0 AWD 550 HP automatic 20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.