Jaguar XF 2012 fuel consumption
Jaguar XF from 2012 to 2015 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 29% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 26% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 32% higher. Since 2012 the Jaguar XF average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Diesel cars | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Jaguar XF | |||
2012 | +23% | +32% | ||
Show all years | ||||
2013 | +27% | +32% | ||
2014 | +30% | +32% | ||
2015 | +33% | +32% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Jaguar XF.
2012 - 2015
Jaguar XF 2012 Sportbrake wagon fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 42.5 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 32.4 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +32% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
2.2 liter diesel engine | ||
Jaguar XF 2012 Sportbrake 2.2D 163 HP automatic | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km+29% |
JAGUAR XF 2012 Sportbrake (X250) 2.2L 190 HP automatic | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km+45% |
JAGUAR XF 2012 Sportbrake (X250) 2.2L 200 HP automatic | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km+41% |
3.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Jaguar XF 2012 Sportbrake 3.0D 240 HP automatic | 37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km+16% |
JAGUAR XF 2012 Sportbrake (X250) 3.0L V6 275 HP automatic | 37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km+27% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.