Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Jeep Cherokee 2005 fuel consumption

Jeep Cherokee from 2005 to 2010 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 13% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 12% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 14% higher.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

Year

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Jeep Cherokee.

2005 - 2006

Jeep Cherokee 2005 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines18.7 MPG
12.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines20.5 MPG
11.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km

According to advertised fuel consumption, Jeep Cherokee 2005 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Jeep Cherokee with 2.8 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Jeep Cherokee 2005 2.8 CRD 158 HP 4x4), but despite this 75% of other similar cars have better fuel economy figures.

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.4 liter petrol engine
Jeep Cherokee 2005 2.4i 147 HP 4x4 manual 22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km
2.8 liter diesel engine
Jeep Cherokee 2005 2.8 CRD 158 HP 4x4 manual 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
Jeep Cherokee 2005 2.8 CRD 158 HP 4x4 automatic 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
3.7 liter petrol engine
Jeep Cherokee 2005 3.7i V6 211 HP 4x4 automatic 16.1 MPG
14.6 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.