Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Kia Ceed 2015 fuel consumption

Kia Ceed from 2015 to 2020 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 27% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 23% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 30% higher. Starting from 2015 Kia Ceed average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2019 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersKia CeedAll carmakersKia Ceed
2015+27%+18% +33%+45%
Show all years
2016+28%+18% +36%+45%
2017+28%+18% +38%+45%
2018+28%+18% +39%+45%
2019+27%+10% +37%-
2020+27%+10% +36%-

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Kia Ceed.

2015

Kia Ceed 2015 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines36.0 MPG
6.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines33.4 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+10%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Kia Ceed 2015 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 6% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Kia Ceed with 1.6 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Kia Pro_Cee`d 1.6 135 HP), but despite this 65% of other similar cars have better fuel economy figures.

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Kia Pro_Cee`d 1.6 130 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+3%
Kia Pro_Cee`d 1.6 130 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
Kia Pro_Cee`d 1.6 135 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+17%
2015 - 2018

Kia Ceed 2015 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines37.6 MPG
6.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines32.6 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+16%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines58.1 MPG
4.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines40.2 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+44%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Kia Ceed 2015 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Kia Ceed with automatic transmission consumes around 0.6 litres per 100 km or 9% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Kia Ceed fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 diesel engine and manual transmission (Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 CRDI 136 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Kia Ceed 2015 1.0 T-GDI 100 HP manual 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
Kia Ceed 2015 1.0 T-GDI 120 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+27%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Kia Cee`d SW 1.4 100 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+13%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Kia Cee`d SW 1.6 130 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+9%
Kia Cee`d SW 1.6 130 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+16%
Kia Cee`d SW 1.6 135 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+17%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 CRDI 136 HP manual 60.3 MPG
3.9 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+44%
Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 CRDI 136 HP automatic 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+45%
2015 - 2018

Kia Ceed 2015 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines39.1 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+21%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines40.2 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+45%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Kia Ceed 2015 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 13% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Kia Ceed with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 8% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Kia Ceed fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 GDI 135 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Kia Ceed 2015 1.0 T-GDI 100 HP manual 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
Kia Ceed 2015 1.0 T-GDI 120 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+35%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Kia cee'd 1.4 100 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+13%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Kia cee`d 1.6 130 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+14%
Kia cee`d 1.6 130 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+16%
Kia cee'd 1.6 135 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+17%
Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 GDI 135 HP manual 43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+31%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 CRDI 136 HP manual 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 CRDI 136 HP automatic 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+45%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.