Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Kia Sportage 2010 fuel consumption

Kia Sportage from 2010 to 2014 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 22% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2010 the Kia Sportage average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersKia SportageAll carmakersKia Sportage
2010+16%+35% +16%+23%
Show all years
2011+19%+35% +19%+24%
2012+21%+35% +23%+24%
2013+23%+35% +27%+24%
2014+26%+35% +30%+24%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Kia Sportage.

2010 - 2014

Kia Sportage 2010 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+35%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines35.9 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines30.1 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+24%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Kia Sportage 2010 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.9 liters per 100 km or 14% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Kia Sportage with automatic transmission consumes around 0.7 litres per 100 km or 8% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Kia Sportage advertised fuel economy is slightly worse than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is among the 20% worst in its class.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 GDI 4WD 136 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Kia Sportage with 2.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 GDI 4WD 136 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Kia Sportage 2010 1.6 16V 135 HP manual 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+22%
1.7 liter diesel engine
Kia Sportage 2010 1.7 CRDI 115 HP manual 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 GDI 2WD 136 HP manual 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 GDI 4WD 136 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+46%
Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 GDI 4WD 136 HP automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 16V 163 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km+36%
Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 2WD 163 HP automatic 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km+38%
Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 4WD 163 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km+36%
Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 4WD 163 HP automatic 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km+33%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 CRDI 136 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+32%
Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 CRDI 136 HP automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+16%
Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 CRDi 4WD 184 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km+21%
Kia Sportage 2011 2.0 CRDI 184 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+28%
Kia Sportage 2011 2.0 CRDI 184 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km+21%
2.4 liter petrol engine
Kia Sportage 2010 2.4 Dual-CVVT 176 HP 4x4 automatic 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.