Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Land Rover Defender 1991 fuel consumption

Land Rover Defender from 1991 to 2002 real fuel consumption according to user reports is similar compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 1992 Land Rover Defender average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 1996 it was similar to average, at 1999 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearDiesel cars
All carmakersLand Rover Defender
1992+2%insignificant
Show all years
1993+3%insignificant
1994+3%insignificant
1995+2%insignificant
1996+2%+3%
1997+3%+7%
1998+4%+3%
1999+5%insignificant
2000+5%insignificant
2001+6%insignificant
2002+7%insignificant

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Land Rover Defender.

1991 - 2002

Land Rover Defender 1991 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines13.0 MPG
18.1 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines21.8 MPG
10.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *insignificant
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.5 liter diesel engine
Land Rover Defender 1992 2.5 110 Tdi 113 HP 4x4 manual 20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km
21.0 MPG
11.2 l/100km-2%
Land Rover Defender 1996 2.5 110 Tdi 113 HP 4x4 manual 23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
21.8 MPG
10.8 l/100km+7%
Land Rover Defender 1998 2.5 110 Td5 122 HP 4x4 manual 21.8 MPG
10.8 l/100km
22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km-1%
3.5 liter petrol engine
Land Rover Defender 1991 3.5 110 V8 136 HP 4x4 manual 13.0 MPG
18.1 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.