Land Rover Freelander 1998 fuel consumption
Land Rover Freelander from 1998 to 2000 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 10% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 1998 the Land Rover Freelander average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Diesel cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Land Rover Freelander | |||
| 1998 | +4% | insignificant | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 1999 | +5% | insignificant | ||
| 2000 | +5% | insignificant | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Land Rover Freelander.
1998 - 2000
Land Rover Freelander 1998 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | insignificant |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
| Land Rover Freelander 1998 Station Wagon 1.8 120 HP 4x4 manual | 23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km |
23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km0% |
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Land Rover Freelander 1998 Station Wagon 2.0 97 HP 4x4 manual | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km-1% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.