Mazda 121 fuel consumption
Of all Mazda 121 modifications produced from 1996 to 2002 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is similar compared to advertised consumption. Since 1996 the Mazda 121 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Mazda 121 | |||
1996 | +4% | insignificant | ||
Show all years | ||||
1997 | +3% | insignificant | ||
1998 | +3% | insignificant | ||
1999 | +3% | insignificant | ||
2000 | +4% | insignificant | ||
2001 | +5% | insignificant | ||
2002 | +5% | insignificant |
1996 - 2002
Mazda 121 1996 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 33.9 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 121 1996 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 6% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda 121 with 1.2 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Mazda 121 1996 1.25i 75 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.2 liter petrol engine | ||
Mazda 121 1996 1.25i 75 HP manual | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km+1% |
Mazda 121 1996 1.25i 75 HP automatic | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
|
1.3 liter petrol engine | ||
Mazda 121 1996 1.3 50 HP manual | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
|
Mazda 121 1996 1.3i 60 HP manual | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
|
1.8 liter diesel engine | ||
Mazda 121 1996 1.8 D 60 HP manual | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.