Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mazda 3 2016 fuel consumption

Mazda 3 from 2016 to 2019 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 22% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 15% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 28% higher. Since 2016 the Mazda 3 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersMazda 3All carmakersMazda 3
2016+28%+25% +36%+43%
Show all years
2017+28%+25% +38%+43%
2018+28%+25% +39%+43%
2019+27%+25% +37%+43%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mazda 3.

2016 - 2019

Mazda 3 2016 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines37.8 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines34.8 MPG
6.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+25%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines55.0 MPG
4.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines40.1 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+43%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 3 2016 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 9% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 3 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.9 litres per 100 km or 17% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mazda 3 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.5 diesel engine and manual transmission (MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Hatchback 1.5L SKYACTIV-D 105 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda 3 with 1.5 petrol engine and manual transmission (MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Hatchback 1.5L SKYACTIV-G 100 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.5 liter petrol engine
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Hatchback 1.5L SKYACTIV-G 100 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+25%
Mazda 3 2016 1.5 120 HP automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+21%
1.5 liter diesel engine
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Hatchback 1.5L SKYACTIV-D 105 HP manual 61.9 MPG
3.8 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+37%
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Hatchback 1.5L SKYACTIV-D Automatic 105 HP automatic 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+50%
2.0 liter petrol engine
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Hatchback 2.0L SKYACTIV-G 120 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+29%
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Hatchback 2.0L SKYACTIV-G Automatic 120 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+25%
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165 HP automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
2.2 liter diesel engine
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Hatchback 2.2L SKYACTIV-D 150 HP manual 57.4 MPG
4.1 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+41%
Mazda 3 2017 2.2 SkyActiv-D 150 HP automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
2.5 liter petrol engine
Mazda 3 2018 2.5 SkyActiv-G 184 HP manual 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
Mazda 3 2018 2.5 SkyActiv-G Automatic 184 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
2016 - 2019

Mazda 3 2016 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines34.9 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines34.8 MPG
6.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+25%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines61.1 MPG
3.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines40.1 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+43%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 3 2016 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.1 liters per 100 km or 2% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 3 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.9 litres per 100 km or 17% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Mazda 3 fuel economy is slightly better than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.5 diesel engine and manual transmission (MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Sedan 1.5L SKYACTIV-D 105 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda 3 with 2.2 diesel engine and manual transmission (MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Sedan 2.2L SKYACTIV-D 150 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.5 liter petrol engine
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Sedan 1.5L SKYACTIV-G 100 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Mazda 3 2016 Sedan 1.5 120 HP automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+21%
1.5 liter diesel engine
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Sedan 1.5L SKYACTIV-D 105 HP manual 61.9 MPG
3.8 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+37%
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Sedan 1.5L SKYACTIV-D Automatic 105 HP automatic 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
1.6 liter petrol engine
Mazda 3 2016 Sedan 1.6 104 HP automatic 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Sedan 2.0L SKYACTIV-G 120 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+29%
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Sedan 2.0L SKYACTIV-G Automatic 120 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+25%
Mazda 3 2018 2.0 SkyActiv-G 155 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Mazda 3 2018 2.0 SkyActiv-G Automatic 155 HP automatic 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
2.2 liter diesel engine
MAZDA 3 2016 / Axela Sedan 2.2L SKYACTIV-D 150 HP manual 60.3 MPG
3.9 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+49%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Mazda 3 2018 2.5 SkyActiv-G 184 HP manual 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
Mazda 3 2018 2.5 SkyActiv-G Automatic 184 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.