Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mazda 323 1994 fuel consumption

Mazda 323 from 1994 to 1998 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 9% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 1994 the Mazda 323 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersMazda 323
1994+6%+17%
Show all years
1995+5%+17%
1996+4%+17%
1997+3%+17%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mazda 323.

1994 - 1997

Mazda 323 1994 3 doors fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines26.8 MPG
8.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+14%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 323 1994 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 6% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 323 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.4 litres per 100 km or 16% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mazda 323 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.5 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 323 1994 1.5i 90 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.3 liter petrol engine
Mazda 323 1994 1.3i 75 HP manual 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+8%
1.5 liter petrol engine
Mazda 323 1994 1.5i 90 HP manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+7%
Mazda 323 1994 1.5i Automatic 90 HP automatic 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+12%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mazda 323 1994 1.8i 116 HP manual 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km+11%
Mazda 323 1994 1.8i Automatic 116 HP automatic 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km+30%
1994 - 1998

Mazda 323 1994 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines28.6 MPG
8.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines23.9 MPG
9.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+20%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 323 1994 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 7% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 323 with automatic transmission consumes around 2 litres per 100 km or 22% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mazda 323 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.5 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 323 1994 F 1.5i 90 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.3 liter petrol engine
Mazda 323 1994 1.3 i 16V 73 HP manual 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
1.5 liter petrol engine
Mazda 323 1994 F 1.5i 90 HP manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+7%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mazda 323 1994 F 1.8i 116 HP manual 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km+11%
Mazda 323 1994 F 1.8i Automatic 116 HP automatic 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km+30%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mazda 323 1994 F 2.0i V6 147 HP manual 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
19.9 MPG
11.8 l/100km+33%
Mazda 323 1994 F 2.0i V6 Automatic 147 HP automatic 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.