Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mazda 6 2008 fuel consumption

Mazda 6 from 2008 to 2010 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 17% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 13% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 22% higher. Starting from 2008 Mazda 6 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 2009 it was similar to average, at 2010 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersMazda 6All carmakersMazda 6
2008+12%+12% +13%+10%
Show all years
2009+14%+12% +14%+15%
2010+16%+12% +16%+15%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mazda 6.

2008 - 2010

Mazda 6 2008 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines31.2 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines28.2 MPG
8.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+11%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines40.8 MPG
5.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines35.5 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+15%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 6 2008 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 8% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 6 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 5% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Mazda 6 fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.2 diesel engine and manual transmission (Mazda 6 2009 SportBreak 2.2 CiTD 163 Hp 163 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda 6 with 2.5 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 6 2008 SportBreak 2.5 S-VT 170 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mazda 6 2008 SportBreak 1.8 120 HP manual 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+13%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mazda 6 2008 SportBreak 2.0 S-VT 147 HP manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+14%
Mazda 6 2008 SportBreak 2.0 S-VT Automatic 147 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km+10%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Mazda 6 2008 SportBreak 2.0 CiTD 140 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+10%
2.2 liter diesel engine
Mazda 6 2009 SportBreak 2.2 CiTD 163 Hp 163 HP manual 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+18%
Mazda 6 2009 SportBreak 2.2 CiTD 185 Hp 185 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+18%
2.5 liter petrol engine
Mazda 6 2008 SportBreak 2.5 S-VT 170 HP manual 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+6%
2008 - 2010

Mazda 6 2008 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines31.1 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+13%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 6 2008 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 6 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mazda 6 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is significantly above average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 6 2008 Sport 2.0 i 147 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda 6 with 2.5 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 6 2008 2.5 170 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mazda 6 2008 Sport 1.8 120 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+14%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mazda 6 2008 Sport 2.0 i 147 HP manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+14%
Mazda 6 2008 Sport 2.0 i Automatic 147 HP automatic 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km+12%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Mazda 6 2008 2.0 CD 140 HP manual 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
2.2 liter diesel engine
Mazda 6 2008 2.2 CD 185 HP manual 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
2.5 liter petrol engine
Mazda 6 2008 2.5 Sport 170 HP automatic 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
Mazda 6 2008 2.5 170 HP manual 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.