Mazda 6 2012 fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Mazda 6 | All carmakers | Mazda 6 | |
2012 | +21% | +23% | +23% | +54% |
Show all years | ||||
2013 | +23% | +23% | +27% | +41% |
2014 | +26% | +23% | +30% | +41% |
2015 | +27% | +23% | +33% | +41% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mazda 6.
Mazda 6 2012 wagon fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.1 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +22% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 50.0 MPG 4.7 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 37.6 MPG 6.3 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +35% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 6 2012 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 6% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 6 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Mazda 6 fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 6 2013 SportBreak 2.0 165 Hp 165 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda 6 with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 6 2012 SportBreak 2.0 145 Hp 145 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Mazda 6 2012 SportBreak 2.0 145 Hp 145 HP manual | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km+20% |
Mazda 6 2013 SportBreak 2.0 165 Hp 165 HP manual | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km+20% |
Mazda 6 2013 SportBreak 2.0 165 Hp Automatic 165 HP automatic | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km+23% |
2.2 liter diesel engine | ||
Mazda 6 2013 SportBreak 2.2D 150 HP manual | 53.5 MPG 4.4 l/100km |
39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km+36% |
Mazda 6 2013 SportBreak 2.2D Automatic 150 HP automatic | 48.0 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km+33% |
Mazda 6 2012 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 HP manual | 51.1 MPG 4.6 l/100km |
|
Mazda 6 2012 2.2 SKYACTIV-D Automatic 175 HP automatic | 48.0 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
|
2.5 liter petrol engine | ||
Mazda 6 2013 SportBreak 2.5 192 HP automatic | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+25% |
Mazda 6 2012 sedan fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 40.2 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 31.2 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +24% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 52.3 MPG 4.5 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +54% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 6 2012 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 9% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 6 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.2 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Mazda 6 fuel economy is among the best, beating more than 80% of other cars. Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda 6 with 2.2 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Mazda 6 2012 2.2 Automatic 150 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Mazda 6 2012 2.0 150 Hp 150 HP manual | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
|
Mazda 6 2012 2.0 150 Hp Automatic 150 HP automatic | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
|
Mazda 6 2012 2.0 165 Hp 165 HP manual | 39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km+22% |
Mazda 6 2012 2.0 165 Hp Automatic 165 HP automatic | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km+23% |
2.2 liter petrol engine | ||
Mazda 6 2012 2.2 Automatic 150 HP automatic | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
|
2.2 liter diesel engine | ||
Mazda 6 2012 2.2 150 HP manual | 60.3 MPG 3.9 l/100km |
39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km+54% |
Mazda 6 2012 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150 Hp Automatic 150 HP automatic | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
|
Mazda 6 2012 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 Hp 175 HP manual | 52.3 MPG 4.5 l/100km |
|
Mazda 6 2012 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 Hp Automatic 175 HP automatic | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
|
2.5 liter petrol engine | ||
Mazda 6 2012 2.5 192 HP automatic | 37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km |
29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+27% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.