Mazda 626 1995 fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Mazda 626 | |||
| 1995 | +5% | +21% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 1996 | +4% | +21% | ||
| 1997 | +3% | +21% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mazda 626.
Mazda 626 1995 hatchback fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 24.2 MPG 9.7 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +21% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 626 1995 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 4% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 626 with automatic transmission consumes around 3.2 litres per 100 km or 40% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mazda 626 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda 626 with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 626 1995 1.8i 106 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mazda 626 1995 1.8i 106 HP manual | 31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mazda 626 1995 2.0i 117 HP manual | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km+5% |
| Mazda 626 1995 2.0i Automatic 117 HP automatic | 28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km |
20.8 MPG 11.3 l/100km+36% |
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Mazda 626 1995 2.0 D 76 HP manual | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
|
| 2.5 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mazda 626 1995 2.5iV6 167 HP manual | 25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km |
|
| Mazda 626 1995 2.5iV6 Automatic 167 HP automatic | 25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km |
|
Mazda 626 1995 sedan fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 24.2 MPG 9.7 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +21% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 626 1995 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 8% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 626 with automatic transmission consumes around 3.2 litres per 100 km or 40% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mazda 626 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is average.
Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda 626 with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 626 1995 1.8i 106 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mazda 626 1995 1.8i 106 HP manual | 31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mazda 626 1995 2.0i 117 HP manual | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km+5% |
| Mazda 626 1995 2.0i Automatic 117 HP automatic | 28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km |
20.8 MPG 11.3 l/100km+36% |
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Mazda 626 1995 2.0 D 76 HP manual | 34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.