Mazda 626 1999 fuel consumption

Mazda 626 from 1999 to 2002 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 5% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 6% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 4% higher. Starting from 1999 Mazda 626 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2001 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

Year	Gasoline cars		Diesel cars
Year	All carmakers	Mazda 626	All carmakers	Mazda 626
1999	+3%	insignificant	+5%	+8%
Show all years
2000	+4%	insignificant	+5%	+4%
2001	+5%	insignificant	+6%	insignificant
2002	+6%	insignificant	+7%	insignificant

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mazda 626.

1999 - 2002

Mazda 626 1999 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	28.4 MPG 8.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+3%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	insignificant

Mazda 626 1999 specs Mazda 626 1999 owner reviews Mazda 626 service info and schedule

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 626 1999 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 9% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 626 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.6 litres per 100 km or 7% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 626 1999 2.0hp 136 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda 626 with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 626 1999 1.8 100 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mazda 626 1999 1.8 100 HP manual	30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km	29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+5%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mazda 626 1999 2.0 115 HP manual	29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km	29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km+3%
Mazda 626 1999 2.0 Automatic 115 HP automatic	27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+2%
Mazda 626 1999 2.0hp 136 HP manual	29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km	28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+2%
Mazda 626 1999 2.0hp Automatic 136 HP automatic	26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Mazda 626 1999 2.0 DiTD 110 HP manual	39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km-2%

Do you own a Mazda 626? Please share your fuel economy!

1999 - 2002

Mazda 626 1999 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	27.8 MPG 8.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	28.5 MPG 8.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	insignificant

Mazda 626 1999 specs Mazda 626 1999 owner reviews Mazda 626 service info and schedule

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 626 1999 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 8% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 626 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 626 1999 Wagon 2.0 115 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda 626 with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 626 1999 Wagon 2.0hp 136 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mazda 626 1999 Wagon 1.8 100 HP manual	29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km	29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km0%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mazda 626 1999 Wagon 2.0 115 HP manual	28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km	29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km-1%
Mazda 626 1999 Wagon 2.0 Automatic 115 HP automatic	27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km	27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km-1%
Mazda 626 1999 Wagon 2.0hp 136 HP manual	28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km	28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km0%
Mazda 626 1999 Wagon 2.0hp Automatic 136 HP automatic	25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Mazda 626 1999 Wagon 2.0 DiTD 110 HP manual	37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km	36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km+3%

Do you own a Mazda 626? Please share your fuel economy!

1999 - 2002

Mazda 626 1999 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines	28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines	28.5 MPG 8.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *	+3%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines	42.4 MPG 5.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines	39.5 MPG 6.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *	+8%

Mazda 626 1999 specs Mazda 626 1999 owner reviews Mazda 626 service info and schedule

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mazda 626 1999 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 9% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mazda 626 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Mazda 626 fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 626 1999 2.0 115 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mazda 626 with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mazda 626 1999 1.8 100 HP).

The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.

Modification	Claimed consumption	Real consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mazda 626 1999 1.8 100 HP manual	30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km	29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+5%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mazda 626 1999 2.0 115 HP manual	29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km	29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km+3%
Mazda 626 1999 2.0 Automatic 115 HP automatic	27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km	27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km+1%
Mazda 626 1999 2.0hp 136 HP manual	29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km	28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+2%
Mazda 626 1999 2.0hp Automatic 136 HP automatic	26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Mazda 626 1999 2.0 DiTD 100 Hp 100 HP manual	45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km	38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km+17%
Mazda 626 2000 2.0 DiTD 110 Hp 110 HP manual	39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km	40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km-2%

Do you own a Mazda 626? Please share your fuel economy!

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.