Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mercedes C class 2013 fuel consumption

Mercedes C class from 2013 to 2019 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 20% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2013 the Mercedes C class average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersMercedes C classAll carmakersMercedes C class
2013+23%+43% +27%+44%
Show all years
2014+26%+44% +30%+44%
2015+27%+44% +33%+44%
2016+28%+44% +36%+44%
2017+28%+44% +38%+44%
2018+28%+44% +39%+44%
2019+27%+60% +37%-

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mercedes C class.

2013

Mercedes C class 2013 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines42.5 MPG
5.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines29.5 MPG
8.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+44%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+43%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mercedes C class 2013 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.1 liters per 100 km or 3% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes C class with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 7% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mercedes C class advertised fuel economy is among the best, beating more than 80% of other cars, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.1 diesel engine and manual transmission (Mercedes C 220 2013 BlueTEC 170 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mercedes C class with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mercedes C 200 2013 184 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 180 2013 156 HP manual 43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+33%
Mercedes C 180 2013 156 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+43%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 200 2013 184 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+47%
Mercedes C 200 2013 184 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+46%
Mercedes C 250 2013 211 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+50%
2.1 liter diesel engine
Mercedes C 220 2013 BlueTEC 170 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+35%
Mercedes C 220 2013 BlueTEC 170 HP automatic 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+43%
Mercedes C 250 2013 BlueTEC 204 HP automatic 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+51%
2013

Mercedes C class 2013 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines38.8 MPG
6.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines26.6 MPG
8.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+45%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines53.2 MPG
4.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+45%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mercedes C class 2013 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 3% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes C class with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 7% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mercedes C class advertised fuel economy is among the best, beating more than 80% of other cars, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.1 diesel engine and manual transmission (Mercedes C 220 2013 CDI 170 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mercedes C class with 2.1 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Mercedes C 300 2013 CDI Hybrid 231 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 180 2013 156 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+31%
Mercedes C 180 2013 156 HP automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+38%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 200 2013 184 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+42%
Mercedes C 200 2013 184 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+46%
Mercedes C 250 2013 211 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+50%
2.1 liter diesel engine
Mercedes C 220 2013 CDI 170 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+38%
Mercedes C 220 2013 CDI 170 HP automatic 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+40%
Mercedes C 250 2013 CDI 4MATIC 204 HP 4x4 automatic 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+36%
Mercedes C 300 2013 CDI Hybrid 231 HP automatic 58.8 MPG
4.0 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+68%
4.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes C 63 2014 S AMG 510 HP automatic 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
18.0 MPG
13.1 l/100km+60%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.