Mercedes CLK 1999 fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Mercedes CLK | |||
| 1999 | +3% | - | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2000 | +4% | insignificant | ||
| 2001 | +5% | insignificant | ||
| 2002 | +6% | insignificant | ||
| 2003 | +6% | +3% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mercedes CLK.
Mercedes CLK 1999 coupe fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 23.6 MPG 10.0 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 24.2 MPG 9.7 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
According to advertised fuel consumption, Mercedes CLK 1999 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes CLK with automatic transmission consumes around 0.9 litres per 100 km or 10% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Mercedes CLK fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.3 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 2000 Kompressor 197 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mercedes CLK with 5.4 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Mercedes CLK 5.4 55 1999 AMG 347 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 1999 136 HP manual | 25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km |
24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km+1% |
| Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 1999 Automatic 136 HP automatic | 24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km |
25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km-2% |
| Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 2000 Kompressor 163 HP manual | 25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km |
24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km+2% |
| Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 2000 Kompressor Automatic 163 HP automatic | 25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km |
23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km+9% |
| 2.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 1999 Kompressor 193 HP manual | 24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km |
24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km0% |
| Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 1999 Kompressor Automatic 193 HP automatic | 23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km |
22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km+6% |
| Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 2000 Kompressor 197 HP manual | 24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km |
23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km+5% |
| Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 2000 Kompressor Automatic 197 HP automatic | 24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km |
23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km+4% |
| 3.2 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes CLK 3.2 320 1999 224 HP automatic | 23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km |
|
| 4.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes CLK 4.3 430 1999 279 HP automatic | 20.6 MPG 11.4 l/100km |
21.0 MPG 11.2 l/100km-2% |
| 5.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes CLK 5.4 55 1999 AMG 347 HP automatic | 20.1 MPG 11.7 l/100km |
|
Mercedes CLK 1999 cabrio fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 23.0 MPG 10.2 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 24.3 MPG 9.7 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
According to advertised fuel consumption, Mercedes CLK 1999 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes CLK with automatic transmission consumes around 0.8 litres per 100 km or 9% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.3 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 2000 Kompressor Cabriolet 197 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mercedes CLK with 5.4 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Mercedes CLK 1999 5.4 AMG CLK 55 V8 347 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 1999 Cabriolet 136 HP manual | 25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km |
24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km+1% |
| Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 1999 Cabriolet Automatic 136 HP automatic | 24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km |
23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km+6% |
| Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 2000 Kompressor Cabriolet 163 HP manual | 24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km |
24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km+1% |
| Mercedes CLK 2.0 200 2000 Kompressor Cabriolet Automatic 163 HP automatic | 25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km |
24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km+2% |
| 2.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 1999 Kompressor Cabriolet 193 HP manual | 23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km |
21.8 MPG 10.8 l/100km+7% |
| Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 1999 Kompressor Cabriolet Automatic 193 HP automatic | 22.8 MPG 10.3 l/100km |
22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km+2% |
| Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 2000 Kompressor Cabriolet 197 HP manual | 24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km |
23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km+4% |
| Mercedes CLK 2.3 230 2000 Kompressor Cabriolet Automatic 197 HP automatic | 24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km |
23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km+3% |
| 3.2 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes CLK 3.2 320 1999 Cabriolet 224 HP automatic | 21.6 MPG 10.9 l/100km |
21.0 MPG 11.2 l/100km+3% |
| 4.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes CLK 4.3 430 1999 Cabriolet 279 HP automatic | 19.3 MPG 12.2 l/100km |
19.1 MPG 12.3 l/100km+1% |
| 5.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Mercedes CLK 1999 5.4 AMG CLK 55 V8 347 HP automatic | 20.1 MPG 11.7 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.