Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mercedes E class 2002 fuel consumption

Mercedes E class from 2002 to 2006 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 11% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 11% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 12% higher. Starting from 2002 Mercedes E class average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2004 it was similar to average, at 2005 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersMercedes E classAll carmakersMercedes E class
2002+6%+9% +7%+17%
Show all years
2003+6%+9% +8%+17%
2004+7%+8% +9%+17%
2005+8%+11% +10%+16%
2006+9%+12% +11%+14%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mercedes E class.

2002 - 2006

Mercedes E class 2002 W211 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+11%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+16%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mercedes E class 2002 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 3% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes E class with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 7% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mercedes E class advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.1 diesel engine and manual transmission (Mercedes E 200 2003 CDI 122 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mercedes E class with 3.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mercedes E 280 2005 231 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 200 2002 Kompressor 163 HP manual 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km+7%
Mercedes E 200 2002 Kompressor Automatic 163 HP automatic 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+18%
Mercedes E 200 2004 NGT 163 HP automatic 24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km
24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km+1%
2.1 liter diesel engine
Mercedes E 200 2003 CDI 122 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+5%
Mercedes E 200 2003 CDI Automatic 122 HP automatic 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+24%
Mercedes E 220 2002 CDI 150 HP manual 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+14%
Mercedes E 220 2002 CDI Automatic 150 HP automatic 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+16%
2.6 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 240 2002 177 HP manual 21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km
20.5 MPG
11.5 l/100km+6%
Mercedes E 240 2002 Automatic 177 HP automatic 22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
21.2 MPG
11.1 l/100km+8%
Mercedes E 240 2004 4Matic 177 HP 4x4 automatic 22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km
20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km+8%
2.7 liter diesel engine
Mercedes E 270 2002 CDI 177 HP manual 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+14%
Mercedes E 270 2002 CDI Automatic 177 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+25%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 280 2005 231 HP manual 25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
Mercedes E 280 2005 4Matic 231 HP 4x4 automatic 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km+15%
Mercedes E 280 2005 Automatic 231 HP automatic 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km+21%
3.0 liter diesel engine
Mercedes E 280 2005 CDI 190 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km+25%
Mercedes E 280 2005 CDI 4Matic 190 HP 4x4 automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km+17%
Mercedes E 280 2005 CDI Automatic 190 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+15%
3.2 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 320 2002 224 HP automatic 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km+8%
Mercedes E 320 2004 4Matic 224 HP 4x4 automatic 22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
19.3 MPG
12.2 l/100km+18%
3.2 liter diesel engine
Mercedes E 280 2004 CDI 177 HP automatic 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km+21%
Mercedes E 320 2003 CDI 204 HP automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+20%
Mercedes E 320 2005 CDI 224 HP automatic 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+19%
Mercedes E 320 2005 CDI 4Matic 224 HP 4x4 automatic 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+10%
3.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 350 2005 272 HP automatic 24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km
20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km+21%
Mercedes E 350 2005 4Matic 272 HP 4x4 automatic 22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km
20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km+13%
4.0 liter diesel engine
Mercedes E 400 2004 CDI 260 HP automatic 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
Mercedes E 420 2005 CDI 314 HP automatic 25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km+5%
5.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 500 2002 306 HP automatic 20.5 MPG
11.5 l/100km
18.8 MPG
12.5 l/100km+9%
Mercedes E 500 2004 306 HP automatic 20.5 MPG
11.5 l/100km
18.8 MPG
12.5 l/100km+9%
Mercedes E 500 2004 4Matic 306 HP 4x4 automatic 19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km
18.8 MPG
12.5 l/100km+4%
5.4 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 55 2002 AMG 476 HP automatic 18.2 MPG
12.9 l/100km
17.0 MPG
13.8 l/100km+7%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.