Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mercedes E class 2013 fuel consumption

Mercedes E class from 2013 to 2016 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 11% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 11% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 12% higher. Since 2013 the Mercedes E class average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersMercedes E classAll carmakersMercedes E class
2013+23%+34% +27%+36%
Show all years
2014+26%+34% +30%+36%
2015+27%+34% +33%+38%
2016+28%+34% +36%+38%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mercedes E class.

2013 - 2016

Mercedes E class 2013 S212 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines30.0 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines22.3 MPG
10.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+33%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines43.2 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines32.8 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+32%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Mercedes E class 2013 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes E class with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 4% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mercedes E class advertised fuel economy is slightly better than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Mercedes E 250 2013 211 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mercedes E class with 3.5 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Mercedes E 300 2013 4Matic 252 HP 4x4).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 200 2013 184 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Mercedes E 200 2013 Automatic 184 HP automatic 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+45%
Mercedes E 250 2013 211 HP automatic 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km+51%
2.1 liter diesel engine
Mercedes E 200 2013 CDI 136 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+19%
Mercedes E 200 2013 CDI Automatic 136 HP automatic 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+30%
Mercedes E 220 2013 CDI 170 HP manual 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+38%
Mercedes E 220 2013 CDI Automatic 170 HP automatic 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+33%
Mercedes E 250 2013 CDI 204 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+31%
Mercedes E 250 2013 CDI Automatic 204 HP automatic 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+30%
Mercedes E 250 CDI 4Matic 2013 204 HP 4x4 automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
3.0 liter diesel engine
Mercedes E 300 2013 BlueTEC 231 HP automatic 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+37%
Mercedes E 350 2013 BlueTEC 265 HP automatic 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+44%
Mercedes E 350 2013 BlueTEC 4Matic 265 HP 4x4 automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+28%
3.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 300 2013 252 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km+32%
Mercedes E 300 2013 4Matic 252 HP 4x4 automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km+33%
4.7 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 500 2013 408 HP automatic 25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
19.8 MPG
11.9 l/100km+28%
Mercedes E 500 2013 4Matic 408 HP 4x4 automatic 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
19.4 MPG
12.1 l/100km+27%
5.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 63 2013 AMG 558 HP automatic 22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km
19.1 MPG
12.3 l/100km+17%
2013 - 2016

Mercedes E class 2013 W212 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines30.4 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+34%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines45.9 MPG
5.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines32.9 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+40%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Mercedes E class 2013 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mercedes E class with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 4% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Mercedes E class advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 3.5 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Mercedes E 350 2013 4Matic 306 HP 4x4). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mercedes E class with 5.5 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Mercedes E 63 2013 AMG 558 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 200 2013 184 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
Mercedes E 200 2013 Automatic 184 HP automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+50%
Mercedes E 250 2013 211 HP automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km+59%
2.1 liter diesel engine
Mercedes E 200 2013 CDI 136 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+29%
Mercedes E 200 2013 CDI Automatic 136 HP automatic 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+41%
Mercedes E 220 2013 CDI 170 HP manual 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+47%
Mercedes E 220 2013 CDI Automatic 170 HP automatic 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+47%
Mercedes E 250 2013 CDI 204 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+42%
Mercedes E 250 2013 CDI 4Matic 204 HP 4x4 automatic 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+25%
Mercedes E 250 2013 CDI Automatic 204 HP automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+44%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 400 2013 4MATIC 333 HP 4x4 automatic 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km+20%
3.0 liter diesel engine
Mercedes E 300 2013 BlueTEC 231 HP automatic 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+42%
Mercedes E 350 2013 BlueTEC 252 HP automatic 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+42%
Mercedes E 350 2013 BlueTEC 4Matic 252 HP 4x4 automatic 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+42%
3.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 300 2013 252 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km+38%
Mercedes E 300 2013 4Matic 252 HP 4x4 automatic 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km+39%
Mercedes E 350 2013 306 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+28%
Mercedes E 350 2013 4Matic 306 HP 4x4 automatic 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+28%
4.7 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 500 2013 408 HP automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km+35%
Mercedes E 500 2013 4Matic 408 HP 4x4 automatic 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km+28%
5.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes E 63 2013 AMG 558 HP automatic 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
19.1 MPG
12.3 l/100km+26%
Mercedes E 63 2013 AMG 4Matic 558 HP 4x4 automatic 22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
19.1 MPG
12.3 l/100km+19%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.