Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mercedes ML 2011 fuel consumption

Mercedes ML from 2011 to 2016 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 18% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2011 the Mercedes ML average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersMercedes MLAll carmakersMercedes ML
2011+19%+48% +19%+46%
Show all years
2012+21%+48% +23%+46%
2013+23%+48% +27%+46%
2014+26%+48% +30%+46%
2015+27%+48% +33%+46%
2016+28%+48% +36%+46%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mercedes ML.

2011

Mercedes ML 2011 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines18.1 MPG
13.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+48%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines25.2 MPG
9.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+46%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.1 liter diesel engine
Mercedes ML 2.1 250 2011 BlueTEC 4Matic 204 HP 4x4 automatic 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+42%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes ML 3.0 400 2011 333 HP 4x4 automatic 25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
3.0 liter diesel engine
Mercedes ML 3.0 350 2011 BlueTEC 4Matic 258 HP 4x4 automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
23.1 MPG
10.2 l/100km+50%
3.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes ML 3.5 350 2011 4Matic 306 HP 4x4 automatic 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
18.7 MPG
12.6 l/100km+48%
4.7 liter petrol engine
Mercedes ML 4.7 500 2011 408 HP 4x4 automatic 17.6 MPG
13.4 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.