Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mercedes S class 2002 fuel consumption

Mercedes S class from 2002 to 2005 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 11% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 10% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 12% higher. Starting from 2002 Mercedes S class average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2004 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersMercedes S classAll carmakersMercedes S class
2002+6%+9% +7%+12%
Show all years
2003+6%+8% +8%+12%
2004+7%+8% +9%+10%
2005+8%+8% +10%+10%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mercedes S class.

2002 - 2005

Mercedes S class 2002 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines19.5 MPG
12.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines18.7 MPG
12.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+3%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines27.2 MPG
8.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines27.8 MPG
8.5 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+10%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
3.2 liter diesel engine
Mercedes S 320 2002 CDI 204 HP automatic 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km+12%
Mercedes S 320 2004 CDI Long 204 HP automatic 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+8%
3.7 liter petrol engine
Mercedes S 350 2002 245 HP automatic 21.2 MPG
11.1 l/100km
19.9 MPG
11.8 l/100km+6%
Mercedes S 350 2002 Lang 245 HP automatic 21.2 MPG
11.1 l/100km
19.9 MPG
11.8 l/100km+6%
Mercedes S 350 2003 4Matic 245 HP 4x4 automatic 19.8 MPG
11.9 l/100km
19.6 MPG
12.0 l/100km+1%
Mercedes S 350 2003 4Matic Long 245 HP 4x4 automatic 19.8 MPG
11.9 l/100km
19.4 MPG
12.1 l/100km+2%
4.0 liter diesel engine
Mercedes S 400 2002 CDI 250 HP automatic 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
Mercedes S 400 2002 CDI Long 250 HP automatic 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
4.3 liter petrol engine
Mercedes S 430 2002 279 HP automatic 20.5 MPG
11.5 l/100km
17.7 MPG
13.3 l/100km+16%
Mercedes S 430 2002 4Matic 279 HP 4x4 automatic 18.8 MPG
12.5 l/100km
17.7 MPG
13.3 l/100km+6%
Mercedes S 430 2002 4Matic Long 279 HP 4x4 automatic 18.8 MPG
12.5 l/100km
17.7 MPG
13.3 l/100km+6%
Mercedes S 430 2002 Long 279 HP automatic 20.5 MPG
11.5 l/100km
17.7 MPG
13.3 l/100km+16%
Mercedes S 430 2004 279 HP automatic 21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km
Mercedes S 430 2004 Long 279 HP automatic 21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km
5.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes S 500 2002 306 HP automatic 19.8 MPG
11.9 l/100km
20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km-2%
Mercedes S 500 2002 4Matic 306 HP 4x4 automatic 18.2 MPG
12.9 l/100km
18.5 MPG
12.7 l/100km-2%
Mercedes S 500 2002 4Matic Long 306 HP 4x4 automatic 18.2 MPG
12.9 l/100km
18.5 MPG
12.7 l/100km-2%
Mercedes S 500 2002 Long 306 HP automatic 19.8 MPG
11.9 l/100km
20.1 MPG
11.7 l/100km-2%
Mercedes S 500 2004 306 HP automatic 20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km
20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km-1%
Mercedes S 500 2004 Long 306 HP automatic 20.6 MPG
11.4 l/100km
20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km-1%
Mercedes S 55 2002 AMG Long 360 HP automatic 17.8 MPG
13.2 l/100km
5.4 liter petrol engine
Mercedes S 55 2002 AMG 500 HP automatic 17.8 MPG
13.2 l/100km
14.1 MPG
16.7 l/100km+27%
5.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes S 600 2002 Long 500 HP automatic 15.9 MPG
14.8 l/100km
14.5 MPG
16.2 l/100km+9%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.