Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mercedes SL 2008 fuel consumption

Mercedes SL from 2008 to 2012 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 15% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2008 Mercedes SL average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2009 it was similar to average, at 2011 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersMercedes SL
2008+12%+15%
Show all years
2009+14%+15%
2010+16%+15%
2011+19%+15%
2012+21%+15%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mercedes SL.

2008 - 2012

Mercedes SL 2008 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines19.5 MPG
12.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines17.0 MPG
13.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+15%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
3.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes SL 3.0 280 2008 231 HP automatic 25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km
3.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes SL 3.5 350 2008 315 HP automatic 24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km
22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km+6%
5.5 liter petrol engine
Mercedes SL 5.5 500 2008 388 HP automatic 20.3 MPG
11.6 l/100km
Mercedes SL 5.5 600 2008 517 HP automatic 16.9 MPG
13.9 l/100km
6.0 liter petrol engine
Mercedes SL 2008 6.0 AMG SL 65 V12 612 HP automatic 16.8 MPG
14.0 l/100km
6.2 liter petrol engine
Mercedes SL 6.2 63 2008 AMG 525 HP automatic 16.9 MPG
13.9 l/100km
13.6 MPG
17.3 l/100km+24%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.