Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mitsubishi ASX 2010 fuel consumption

Mitsubishi ASX from 2010 to 2012 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 20% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 16% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 23% higher. Starting from 2010 Mitsubishi ASX average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2011 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersMitsubishi ASXAll carmakersMitsubishi ASX
2010+16%+15% +16%+19%
Show all years
2011+19%+15% +19%+19%
2012+21%+15% +23%+19%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mitsubishi ASX.

2010 - 2012

Mitsubishi ASX 2010 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines32.5 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+15%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+19%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Mitsubishi ASX 2010 1.6 117 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+15%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Mitsubishi ASX 2010 1.8 140 HP automatic 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
1.8 liter diesel engine
Mitsubishi ASX 2010 1.8 DI-D DOHC MIVEC 150 HP 4x4 manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+19%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mitsubishi ASX 2010 2.0 4WD 150 HP automatic 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.