Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mitsubishi ASX 2016 fuel consumption

Mitsubishi ASX from 2016 to 2017 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 20% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 16% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 23% higher. Since 2016 the Mitsubishi ASX average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersMitsubishi ASXAll carmakersMitsubishi ASX
2016+28%+16% +36%+29%
Show all years
2017+28%+16% +38%+29%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mitsubishi ASX.

2016 - 2017

Mitsubishi ASX 2016 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+16%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines45.8 MPG
5.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines35.5 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+29%
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Mitsubishi ASX 2016 1.6 2WD 117 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+16%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Mitsubishi ASX 2016 1.6 Di-D 114 HP 4x4 manual 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+22%
Mitsubishi ASX 2016 1.6 Di-D 114 HP manual 51.1 MPG
4.6 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+33%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Mitsubishi ASX 2016 2.0 4WD 150 HP automatic 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
2.3 liter diesel engine
Mitsubishi ASX 2016 2.3 2.2 Di-D 150 HP 4x4 automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+33%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.