Mitsubishi Carisma fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Mitsubishi Carisma | All carmakers | Mitsubishi Carisma | |
1995 | +5% | +16% | +2% | - |
Show all years | ||||
1996 | +4% | +16% | +2% | insignificant |
1997 | +3% | +13% | +3% | insignificant |
1998 | +3% | +13% | +4% | insignificant |
1999 | +3% | +13% | +5% | insignificant |
2000 | +4% | +13% | +5% | insignificant |
2001 | +5% | +10% | +6% | +11% |
2002 | +6% | +10% | +7% | +11% |
2003 | +6% | +10% | +8% | +11% |
2004 | +7% | +10% | +9% | +13% |
2005 | +8% | - | +10% | +13% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mitsubishi Carisma.
Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 hatchback fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 31.6 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +8% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +9% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 9% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mitsubishi Carisma with automatic transmission consumes around 0.8 litres per 100 km or 11% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Mitsubishi Carisma fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 1.8 125 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mitsubishi Carisma with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 1.8 16V 140 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 1.6 90 HP manual | 29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km+5% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 1.6 90 HP automatic | 29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+4% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 1.6 100 HP manual | 32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+4% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 2000 1.6 100 HP automatic | 28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 1.6 100 HP manual | 32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 1.6 100 HP automatic | 28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km |
|
1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 1.8 16V 116 HP manual | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+19% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 1.8 16V 116 HP automatic | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km+25% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 1.8 125 HP manual | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km+10% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 1.8 125 HP automatic | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+9% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 1.8 16V 140 HP manual | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
|
1.9 liter diesel engine | ||
Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 1.9 TD 90 HP manual | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km-2% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 1.9 DI-D 102 HP manual | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km+9% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 1.9 DI-D 102 HP manual | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km+16% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 1.9 DI-D HP 115 HP manual | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km+13% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 sedan fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 32.5 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.0 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +8% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 41.8 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 39.4 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +6% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.9 liters per 100 km or 12% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Mitsubishi Carisma with automatic transmission consumes around 0.7 litres per 100 km or 9% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Mitsubishi Carisma fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 1.8 125 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Mitsubishi Carisma with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 1.8 16V 140 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.3 liter petrol engine | ||
Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 1.3 82 HP manual | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
|
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 1.6 90 HP manual | 32.2 MPG 7.3 l/100km |
30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km+4% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 1.6 90 HP automatic | 28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km |
27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+4% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 1.6 100 HP manual | 32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+4% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 1.6 100 HP automatic | 28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km |
|
1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 1.8 116 HP manual | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km+19% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 1.8 116 HP automatic | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km+25% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 1.8 125 HP manual | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km+10% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 1.8 125 HP automatic | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+9% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 1.8 16V 140 HP manual | 35.1 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
|
1.9 liter diesel engine | ||
Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 1.9 TD 90 HP manual | 39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km |
39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km-2% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 1.9 DI-D 102 HP manual | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km+9% |
Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 1.9 DI-D 115 HP manual | 43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km |
39.2 MPG 6.0 l/100km+11% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.