Mitsubishi L 200 2010 fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Diesel cars | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Mitsubishi L 200 | |||
2010 | +16% | +29% | ||
Show all years | ||||
2011 | +19% | +29% | ||
2012 | +23% | +29% | ||
2013 | +27% | +29% | ||
2014 | +30% | +29% | ||
2015 | +33% | +29% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Mitsubishi L 200.
Mitsubishi L 200 2010 fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 28.2 MPG 8.4 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +29% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Mitsubishi L 200 2010 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 9% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Mitsubishi L 200 fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption.
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
2.5 liter diesel engine | ||
Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab 2.5 DI-D 4WD 136 HP manual | 28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km |
|
Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab 2.5 DI-D 4WD 136 HP automatic | 27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 2010 2.5 HP DI-D 178 HP 4x4 manual | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km+29% |
Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab 2.5 DI-D 4WD 178 HP automatic | 27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.