Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Mitsubishi Pajero fuel consumption

Of all Mitsubishi Pajero modifications produced from 1991 to 2019 real fuel consumption according to user ratings is approximately 7% higher compared to advertised consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 11% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 3% higher. Starting from 1991 Mitsubishi Pajero average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2002 it was slightly above industry average, at 2010 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. It is noteworthy during this period that the gap between advertised and actual fuel economy changed significantly throughout the automotive industry. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersMitsubishi PajeroAll carmakersMitsubishi Pajero
1991+5%+24% +4%-
Show all years
1992+5%+24% +2%-
1993+5%+24% +3%-
1994+6%+24% +3%+13%
1995+5%+24% +2%+13%
1996+4%+14% +2%+13%
1997+3%+14% +3%+10%
1998+3%-+4%+6%
1999+3%-+5%+6%
2000+4%+11% +5%insignificant
2001+5%+11% +6%-
2002+6%+11% +7%-
2003+6%+11% +8%+3%
2004+7%-+9%+7%
2005+8%-+10%+10%
2006+9%+16% +11%+10%
2007+11%+16% +12%+9%
2008+12%+16% +13%+11%
2009+14%+16% +14%+11%
2010+16%+16% +16%+10%
2011+19%+16% +19%+10%

Select Mitsubishi Pajero generation

For detailed fuel economy data, including advertised versus real-world fuel consumption and consumption differences between different engines and transmissions.

Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 - 2011 fuel economy Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 - 2006 3 durvis fuel economy Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 - 2003 fuel economy Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 - 2000 fuel economy Mitsubishi Pajero 1991 - 1997 fuel economy
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.