Nissan Pathfinder 1995 fuel consumption
Nissan Pathfinder from 1995 to 2004 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 9% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 3% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 15% higher.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year |
|---|
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Nissan Pathfinder.
1995 - 2004
Nissan Pathfinder 1995 2 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 16.8 MPG 14.0 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 17.8 MPG 13.2 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 20.1 MPG 11.7 l/100km |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.7 liter diesel engine | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder 1997 2.7 TD 131 HP 4x4 manual | 20.5 MPG 11.5 l/100km |
|
| 3.2 liter diesel engine | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder 1997 3.2 TD 150 HP 4x4 manual | 19.8 MPG 11.9 l/100km |
|
| 3.3 liter petrol engine | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder 2000 3.3 V6 150 HP 4x4 automatic | 16.9 MPG 13.9 l/100km |
|
| Nissan Pathfinder 1995 3.3 V6 170 HP 4x4 manual | 16.9 MPG 13.9 l/100km |
|
| 3.5 liter petrol engine | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder 2001 3.5 i V6 24V 220 HP 4x4 automatic | 16.2 MPG 14.5 l/100km |
16.2 MPG 14.5 l/100km0% |
| Nissan Pathfinder 2001 3.5 i V6 24V LE 243 HP 4x4 automatic | 15.6 MPG 15.1 l/100km |
|
| Nissan Pathfinder 2001 3.5 i V6 24V SE 253 HP 4x4 manual | 18.5 MPG 12.7 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.