Nissan Terrano 1993 fuel consumption
Nissan Terrano from 1993 to 1996 real fuel consumption according to user reports is similar compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is similar to manufacturer's stated consumption, but for diesel engines is approximately 4% higher. Since 1993 the Nissan Terrano average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Diesel cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Nissan Terrano | |||
| 1993 | +3% | +13% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 1994 | +3% | +13% | ||
| 1995 | +2% | +13% | ||
| 1996 | +2% | +13% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Nissan Terrano.
1993 - 1996
Nissan Terrano 1993 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 20.6 MPG 11.4 l/100km |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 20.6 MPG 11.4 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +13% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Nissan Terrano 1993 II 2.4 124 HP 4x4 manual | 20.6 MPG 11.4 l/100km |
|
| 2.7 liter diesel engine | ||
| Nissan Terrano 1993 II 2.7 TD 101 HP 4x4 manual | 23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km |
20.6 MPG 11.4 l/100km+13% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.