Nissan Terrano 1996 fuel consumption
Nissan Terrano from 1996 to 2000 real fuel consumption according to user reports is similar compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is similar to manufacturer's stated consumption, but for diesel engines is approximately 4% higher. Since 1996 the Nissan Terrano average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Nissan Terrano | All carmakers | Nissan Terrano | |
| 1996 | +4% | insignificant | +2% | +7% |
| Show all years | ||||
| 1997 | +3% | insignificant | +3% | +7% |
| 1998 | +3% | insignificant | +4% | +7% |
| 1999 | +3% | insignificant | +5% | +7% |
| 2000 | +4% | insignificant | +5% | +7% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Nissan Terrano.
1996 - 2000
Nissan Terrano 1996 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 19.1 MPG 12.3 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 19.4 MPG 12.1 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | insignificant |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 21.0 MPG 11.2 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +7% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Nissan Terrano 1996 II 2.4 118 HP 4x4 manual | 19.1 MPG 12.3 l/100km |
19.4 MPG 12.1 l/100km-2% |
| 2.7 liter diesel engine | ||
| Nissan Terrano 1996 II 2.7 TD 125 HP 4x4 manual | 22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km |
21.0 MPG 11.2 l/100km+7% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.