Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Nissan Terrano 2000 fuel consumption

Nissan Terrano from 2000 to 2002 real fuel consumption according to user reports is similar compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is similar to manufacturer's stated consumption, but for diesel engines is approximately 4% higher. Since 2000 the Nissan Terrano average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearDiesel cars
All carmakersNissan Terrano
2000+5%insignificant
Show all years
2001+6%insignificant
2002+7%insignificant

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Nissan Terrano.

2000 - 2002

Nissan Terrano 2000 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines19.1 MPG
12.3 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *insignificant

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Nissan Terrano 2000 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.8 liters per 100 km or 8% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Nissan Terrano with 2.7 diesel engine and manual transmission (Nissan Terrano 2000 II 2.7 TD 125 HP 4x4), but despite this 60% of other similar cars have better fuel economy figures.

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.4 liter petrol engine
Nissan Terrano 2000 II 2.4 118 HP 4x4 manual 19.1 MPG
12.3 l/100km
2.7 liter diesel engine
Nissan Terrano 2000 II 2.7 TD 125 HP 4x4 manual 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km+6%
Nissan Terrano 2000 II 2.7 TD 125 HP 4x4 automatic 22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.