Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Nissan X-Trail 2014 fuel consumption

Nissan X-Trail from 2014 to 2017 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 18% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 15% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 21% higher. Since 2014 the Nissan X-Trail average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been slightly above industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersNissan X-TrailAll carmakersNissan X-Trail
2014+26%+31% +30%+35%
Show all years
2015+27%+31% +33%+35%
2016+28%+31% +36%+35%
2017+28%+31% +38%+35%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Nissan X-Trail.

2014 - 2017

Nissan X-Trail 2014 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines28.1 MPG
8.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+31%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines31.2 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+35%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Nissan X-Trail 2014 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.5 liters per 100 km or 5% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Nissan X-Trail with automatic transmission consumes around 0.9 litres per 100 km or 14% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Nissan X-Trail advertised fuel economy is noticeably below average - at least two thirds of similar cars have lower fuel consumption, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is one of the worst.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 dCi 177 HP 4x4). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Nissan X-Trail with 2.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Nissan X-Trail 2014 2.0 2WD 144 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 DIG-T 163 HP manual 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 DIG-T 163 HP manual 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
1.6 liter diesel engine
Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 dCi 130 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+31%
Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 dCi 130 HP automatic 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+41%
Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 dCi All-Mode 130 HP AWD manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+32%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Nissan X-Trail 2014 2.0 2WD 144 HP manual 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2014 2.0 2WD 144 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km+31%
Nissan X-Trail 2014 2.0 4WD 144 HP automatic 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 dCi 177 HP AWD manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 dCi 177 HP AWD manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 dCi 177 HP automatic 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 dCi 177 HP automatic 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 dCi 177 HP AWD automatic 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 dCi 177 HP AWD automatic 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
2.5 liter petrol engine
Nissan X-Trail 2014 2.5 4WD 171 HP automatic 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.