Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Nissan X-Trail 2017 fuel consumption

Nissan X-Trail from 2017 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 18% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 15% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 21% higher. Since 2017 the Nissan X-Trail average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersNissan X-TrailAll carmakersNissan X-Trail
2017+28%+27% +38%+35%
Show all years
2018+28%+27% +39%+35%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Nissan X-Trail.

2017

Nissan X-Trail 2017 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines29.3 MPG
8.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+27%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines43.3 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines32.5 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+35%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Nissan X-Trail 2017 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 7% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Nissan X-Trail with automatic transmission consumes around 0.6 litres per 100 km or 9% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Nissan X-Trail fuel economy is among the 20% worst in its class. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.7 diesel engine and manual transmission (Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.7 dCi 150 HP 4x4). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Nissan X-Trail with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 DIG-T 2WD 163 HP), but despite this 65% of other similar cars have better fuel economy figures.

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.3 liter petrol engine
Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.3 DIG-T 159 HP automatic 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2019 1.3 DIG-T 159 HP automatic 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
1.6 liter petrol engine
Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 DIG-T 2WD 163 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km+27%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 dci 2WD 130 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+35%
Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 dci 2WD 130 HP automatic 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+47%
Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 dci 4WD 130 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+25%
1.7 liter diesel engine
Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.7 dCi 150 HP manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.7 dCi 150 HP AWD manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.7 dCi 150 HP AWD automatic 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2019 1.7 dCi 150 HP AWD manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2019 1.7 dCi 150 HP manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Nissan X-Trail 2019 1.7 dCi 150 HP AWD automatic 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 dci 2WD 177 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+43%
Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 dci 4WD 177 HP manual 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+29%
Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 dci 4WD 177 HP automatic 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km+31%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.