Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Opel Corsa 2003 fuel consumption

Opel Corsa from 2003 to 2006 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 15% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 17% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 14% higher. Since 2003 the Opel Corsa average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersOpel CorsaAll carmakersOpel Corsa
2003+6%+14% +8%+12%
Show all years
2004+7%+14% +9%+12%
2005+8%+15% +10%+12%
2006+9%+16% +11%+12%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Opel Corsa.

2003 - 2006

Opel Corsa 2003 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+13%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines51.5 MPG
4.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines47.7 MPG
4.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+8%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Opel Corsa 2003 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 4% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Opel Corsa with automatic transmission has nearly identical fuel consumption to the version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Opel Corsa fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.2 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Opel Corsa 2003 1.2 1.3 CDTi 70 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Opel Corsa with 1.4 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Opel Corsa 2003 1.4-16V 90 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Opel Corsa 2003 1.0-12V 60 HP automatic 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km+10%
Opel Corsa 2003 1.0 12V 60 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+13%
Opel Corsa 2005 1.0-12V 60 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+11%
Opel Corsa 2005 1.0-12V 60 HP automatic 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+15%
1.2 liter petrol engine
Opel Corsa 2003 1.2-16V 75 HP automatic 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+17%
Opel Corsa 2003 1.2 16V 75 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+10%
Opel Corsa 2004 1.2-16V 80 HP manual 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+10%
Opel Corsa 2004 1.2-16V 80 HP automatic 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+23%
Opel Corsa 2005 1.2-16V 80 HP automatic 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+25%
1.2 liter diesel engine
Opel Corsa 2003 1.2 1.3 CDTI 70 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km+11%
Opel Corsa 2003 1.2 1.3 CDTi 70 HP automatic 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km0%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Opel Corsa 2003 1.4-16V 90 HP automatic 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+26%
Opel Corsa 2003 1.4 16V 90 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+14%
Opel Corsa 2003 1.4 16V 90 HP automatic 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km0%
1.7 liter diesel engine
Opel Corsa 2003 1.7 CDTI 101 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+13%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Opel Corsa 2003 1.8 16V 125 HP manual 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+5%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.