Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Opel Insignia 2017 fuel consumption

Opel Insignia from 2017 to 2020 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 29% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2017 Opel Insignia average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 2019 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersOpel InsigniaAll carmakersOpel Insignia
2017+28%+27% +38%+30%
Show all years
2018+28%+27% +39%+30%
2019+27%+31% +37%+30%
2020+27%+31% +36%+30%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Opel Insignia.

2017 - 2020

Opel Insignia 2017 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines35.3 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines28.4 MPG
8.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+26%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+23%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Opel Insignia 2017 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.5 liters per 100 km or 8% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Opel Insignia with automatic transmission consumes around 0.9 litres per 100 km or 12% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Opel Insignia 2017 Sports Tourer 2.0 CDTI 170 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.5 liter petrol engine
Opel Insignia 2017 Sports Tourer 1.5 140 Hp 140 HP manual 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+26%
Opel Insignia 2017 Sports Tourer 1.5 165 Hp 165 HP manual 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+29%
Opel Insignia 2017 Sports Tourer 1.5 165 Hp Automatic 165 HP automatic 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+35%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Opel Insignia 2018 1.6 Turbo 200 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
Opel Insignia 2017 Sports Tourer 2.0 4x4 260 HP automatic 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+14%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Opel Insignia 2017 2.0 170 HP 4x4 manual 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
Opel Insignia 2017 2.0 Automatic 170 HP automatic 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Opel Insignia 2017 Sports Tourer 2.0 CDTI 170 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+23%
Opel Insignia 2018 2.0d 170 HP 4x4 manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Opel Insignia 2018 2.0d Automatic 170 HP automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
Opel Insignia 2017 2.0 BiTurbo 210 HP 4x4 automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Opel Insignia 2019 2.0d BiTurbo 210 HP 4x4 automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
2017 - 2020

Opel Insignia 2017 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines36.0 MPG
6.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines28.5 MPG
8.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+28%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines36.9 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+32%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Opel Insignia 2017 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 13% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Opel Insignia with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Opel Insignia fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Opel Insignia 2017 Grand Sport 2.0 CDTI 170 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Opel Insignia with 1.6 diesel engine and manual transmission (Opel Insignia 2017 Grand Sport 1.6 CDTI 136 Hp 136 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.5 liter petrol engine
Opel Insignia 2017 Grand Sport 1.5 140 Hp 140 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+28%
Opel Insignia 2017 Grand Sport 1.5 165 Hp 165 HP manual 41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+32%
Opel Insignia 2017 Grand Sport 1.5 165 Hp Automatic 165 HP automatic 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+36%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Opel Insignia 2017 Grand Sport 1.6 CDTI 110 Hp 110 HP manual 58.8 MPG
4.0 l/100km
Opel Insignia 2017 Grand Sport 1.6 CDTI 136 Hp 136 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+47%
Opel Insignia 2017 Grand Sport 1.6 CDTI 136 Hp Automatic 136 HP automatic 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+24%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Opel Insignia 2017 Grand Sport 2.0 4x4 260 HP automatic 27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+15%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Opel Insignia 2017 2.0 CDTI 170 HP 4x4 manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Opel Insignia 2017 Grand Sport 2.0 CDTI 170 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+25%
Opel Insignia 2018 2.0d 170 HP 4x4 manual
Opel Insignia 2017 GSi 2.0 CDTI BiTurbo 210 HP 4x4 automatic 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
Opel Insignia 2019 GSi 2.0d BiTurbo 210 HP 4x4 automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.