Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Opel Omega 1989 fuel consumption

Opel Omega from 1989 to 1994 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 6% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 3% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 10% higher. Since 1990 the Opel Omega average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersOpel Omega
1990+5%+6%
Show all years
1991+5%+5%
1992+5%+5%
1993+5%+5%
1994+6%+5%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Opel Omega.

1989 - 1994

Opel Omega 1989 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines23.0 MPG
10.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines22.7 MPG
10.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+3%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines31.9 MPG
7.4 l/100km

According to advertised fuel consumption, Opel Omega 1989 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Opel Omega with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 4% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Opel Omega fuel economy is slightly worse than average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 3.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Opel Omega 1991 Caravan 3.0i 24V 200 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Opel Omega with 2.3 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Opel Omega 1989 Caravan 2.3 TD 101 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Opel Omega 1989 Caravan 2.0i 115 HP manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
25.0 MPG
9.4 l/100km+2%
Opel Omega 1989 Caravan 2.0i 115 HP automatic 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km+5%
2.3 liter diesel engine
Opel Omega 1989 Caravan 2.3 D 73 HP manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Opel Omega 1989 Caravan 2.3 TD 101 HP manual 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Opel Omega 1989 Caravan 2.3 TD 101 HP automatic 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
2.4 liter petrol engine
Opel Omega 1989 Caravan 2.4i 125 HP manual 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
Opel Omega 1989 Caravan 2.4i 125 HP automatic 24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km
2.6 liter petrol engine
Opel Omega 1990 Caravan 2.6i 150 HP manual 22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km
22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km+1%
Opel Omega 1990 Caravan 2.6i 150 HP automatic 22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km
19.3 MPG
12.2 l/100km+14%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Opel Omega 1989 Caravan 3.0i 177 HP manual 20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km
Opel Omega 1989 Caravan 3.0i 177 HP automatic 21.8 MPG
10.8 l/100km
Opel Omega 1991 Caravan 3.0i 24V 200 HP manual 22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km
22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km+1%
Opel Omega 1991 Caravan 3.0i 24V 200 HP automatic 22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km
1989 - 1994

Opel Omega 1989 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+6%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km

According to advertised fuel consumption, Opel Omega 1989 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Opel Omega with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Opel Omega advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 3.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Opel Omega 1992 3.0i 24V 200 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Opel Omega with 2.3 diesel engine and manual transmission (Opel Omega 1989 2.3 TD 101 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Opel Omega 1989 2.0i 115 HP manual 26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km+9%
Opel Omega 1989 2.0i 115 HP automatic 26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km0%
2.3 liter diesel engine
Opel Omega 1989 2.3 D 73 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Opel Omega 1989 2.3 TD 101 HP manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Opel Omega 1989 2.3 TD 101 HP automatic 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
2.4 liter petrol engine
Opel Omega 1989 2.4i 125 HP manual 25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
Opel Omega 1989 2.4i 125 HP automatic 25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
2.6 liter petrol engine
Opel Omega 1990 2.6i 150 HP manual 22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km
22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km+3%
Opel Omega 1990 2.6i 150 HP automatic 22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km
19.3 MPG
12.2 l/100km+16%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Opel Omega 1989 3.0 3000 177 HP manual 21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km
Opel Omega 1989 3.0 3000 177 HP automatic 22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km
Opel Omega 1992 3.0i 24V 200 HP manual 22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km
22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km+3%
Opel Omega 1992 3.0i 24V 200 HP automatic 22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
Opel Omega 1989 3.0 3000 24V 204 HP manual 22.6 MPG
10.4 l/100km
Opel Omega 1989 3.0 3000 24V 204 HP automatic 22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km
3.6 liter petrol engine
Opel Omega 1990 3.6 Lotus 377 HP manual 22.8 MPG
10.3 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.