Opel Omega 1994 fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Opel Omega | All carmakers | Opel Omega | |
| 1994 | +6% | +12% | +3% | +15% |
| Show all years | ||||
| 1995 | +5% | +11% | +2% | +15% |
| 1996 | +4% | +11% | +2% | +15% |
| 1997 | +3% | +11% | +3% | +15% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Opel Omega.
Opel Omega 1994 wagon fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 23.3 MPG 10.1 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +8% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +13% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, Opel Omega 1994 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Opel Omega with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 5% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Opel Omega advertised fuel economy is slightly better than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Opel Omega 1995 Stationwagon 2.0i 116 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Opel Omega with 3.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Opel Omega 1994 Stationwagon 3.0i-V6 211 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Opel Omega 1995 Stationwagon 2.0i 116 HP manual | 25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km |
24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km+4% |
| Opel Omega 1995 Stationwagon 2.0i 116 HP automatic | 26.1 MPG 9.0 l/100km |
|
| Opel Omega 1994 Stationwagon 2.0i-16V 136 HP manual | 27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km+8% |
| Opel Omega 1994 Stationwagon 2.0i-16V 136 HP automatic | 26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km |
24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km+11% |
| 2.5 liter petrol engine | ||
| Opel Omega 1994 Stationwagon 2.5i-V6 170 HP manual | 25.3 MPG 9.3 l/100km |
23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km+10% |
| Opel Omega 1994 Stationwagon 2.5i-V6 170 HP automatic | 25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km |
22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km+12% |
| 2.5 liter diesel engine | ||
| Opel Omega 1994 Stationwagon 2.5 TD 130 HP manual | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+8% |
| Opel Omega 1994 Stationwagon 2.5 TD 130 HP automatic | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km+18% |
| 3.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Opel Omega 1994 Stationwagon 3.0i-V6 211 HP manual | 23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km |
21.6 MPG 10.9 l/100km+9% |
| Opel Omega 1994 Stationwagon 3.0i-V6 211 HP automatic | 23.5 MPG 10.0 l/100km |
21.0 MPG 11.2 l/100km+12% |
Opel Omega 1994 sedan fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 26.1 MPG 9.0 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 23.4 MPG 10.1 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +11% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 31.6 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +17% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, Opel Omega 1994 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Opel Omega with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Opel Omega advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Opel Omega 1995 2.0i 116 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Opel Omega with 3.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Opel Omega 1994 3.0i-V6 211 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Opel Omega 1995 2.0i 116 HP manual | 26.4 MPG 8.9 l/100km |
27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km-2% |
| Opel Omega 1995 2.0i 116 HP automatic | 26.7 MPG 8.8 l/100km |
|
| Opel Omega 1994 2.0i-16V 136 HP manual | 27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km |
25.0 MPG 9.4 l/100km+11% |
| Opel Omega 1994 2.0i-16V 136 HP automatic | 27.7 MPG 8.5 l/100km |
24.0 MPG 9.8 l/100km+15% |
| 2.5 liter petrol engine | ||
| Opel Omega 1994 2.5i-V6 170 HP manual | 25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km |
23.1 MPG 10.2 l/100km+12% |
| Opel Omega 1994 2.5i-V6 170 HP automatic | 25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km |
22.4 MPG 10.5 l/100km+15% |
| 2.5 liter diesel engine | ||
| Opel Omega 1994 2.5 TD 130 HP manual | 31.8 MPG 7.4 l/100km |
28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+12% |
| Opel Omega 1994 2.5 TD 130 HP automatic | 31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km+21% |
| 3.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Opel Omega 1994 3.0i-V6 211 HP manual | 24.5 MPG 9.6 l/100km |
22.0 MPG 10.7 l/100km+11% |
| Opel Omega 1994 3.0i-V6 211 HP automatic | 24.2 MPG 9.7 l/100km |
21.0 MPG 11.2 l/100km+15% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.