Peugeot 206 1998 fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Peugeot 206 | All carmakers | Peugeot 206 | |
1998 | +3% | +13% | +4% | - |
Show all years | ||||
1999 | +3% | +14% | +5% | - |
2000 | +4% | +13% | +5% | - |
2001 | +5% | +13% | +6% | +12% |
2002 | +6% | +12% | +7% | +12% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Peugeot 206.
Peugeot 206 1998 hatchback fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 34.0 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 31.5 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +13% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 47.7 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +6% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 206 1998 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Peugeot 206 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.4 litres per 100 km or 20% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Peugeot 206 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 206 2000 1.6-16V 110 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.1 liter petrol engine | ||
Peugeot 206 1998 1.1 60 HP manual | 37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+10% |
1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
Peugeot 206 1998 1.4 75 HP manual | 37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km |
34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km+10% |
Peugeot 206 1999 1.4 75 HP automatic | 34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+20% |
1.4 liter diesel engine | ||
Peugeot 206 2002 1.4 HDI 68 HP manual | 54.7 MPG 4.3 l/100km |
49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km+12% |
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Peugeot 206 1998 1.6 90 HP manual | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km+20% |
Peugeot 206 2000 1.6 90 HP automatic | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
|
Peugeot 206 2000 1.6-16V 110 HP manual | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km+8% |
Peugeot 206 2000 1.6-16V 110 HP automatic | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
|
1.9 liter diesel engine | ||
Peugeot 206 1998 1.9 D 70 HP manual | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km+4% |
2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Peugeot 206 2003 2.0 S16 135 HP manual | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
|
2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Peugeot 206 2001 2.0 HDI 90 HP manual | 47.0 MPG 5.0 l/100km |
42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km+12% |
Peugeot 206 1998 3 doors hatchback fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.8 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +13% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 47.7 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +6% |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 206 1998 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Peugeot 206 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.2 litres per 100 km or 17% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Peugeot 206 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 206 2000 1.6-16V 110 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.1 liter petrol engine | ||
Peugeot 206 1998 1.1 60 HP manual | 37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+10% |
1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
Peugeot 206 1998 1.4 75 HP manual | 37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km |
34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km+10% |
Peugeot 206 1999 1.4 75 HP automatic | 34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km |
29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km+17% |
1.4 liter diesel engine | ||
Peugeot 206 2002 1.4 HDI 68 HP manual | 54.7 MPG 4.3 l/100km |
49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km+12% |
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Peugeot 206 1998 1.6 90 HP manual | 33.6 MPG 7.0 l/100km |
28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km+20% |
Peugeot 206 2000 1.6 90 HP automatic | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
|
Peugeot 206 2000 1.6-16V 110 HP manual | 36.8 MPG 6.4 l/100km |
34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km+8% |
Peugeot 206 2000 1.6-16V 110 HP automatic | 33.1 MPG 7.1 l/100km |
|
1.9 liter diesel engine | ||
Peugeot 206 1998 1.9 D 70 HP manual | 42.8 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km+4% |
2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Peugeot 206 1999 GTI 2.0-16V 138 HP manual | 30.5 MPG 7.7 l/100km |
27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km+13% |
2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
Peugeot 206 2001 2.0 HDI 90 HP manual | 47.0 MPG 5.0 l/100km |
42.0 MPG 5.6 l/100km+12% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.