Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Peugeot 206 1998 fuel consumption

Peugeot 206 from 1998 to 2003 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 13% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 1998 the Peugeot 206 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersPeugeot 206All carmakersPeugeot 206
1998+3%+13% +4%-
Show all years
1999+3%+14% +5%-
2000+4%+13% +5%-
2001+5%+13% +6%+12%
2002+6%+12% +7%+12%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Peugeot 206.

1998 - 2003

Peugeot 206 1998 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines34.0 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines31.5 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+13%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines47.7 MPG
4.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+6%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 206 1998 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Peugeot 206 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.4 litres per 100 km or 20% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Peugeot 206 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 206 2000 1.6-16V 110 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 1998 1.1 60 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+10%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 1998 1.4 75 HP manual 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+10%
Peugeot 206 1999 1.4 75 HP automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+20%
1.4 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2002 1.4 HDI 68 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km+12%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 1998 1.6 90 HP manual 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+20%
Peugeot 206 2000 1.6 90 HP automatic 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Peugeot 206 2000 1.6-16V 110 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+8%
Peugeot 206 2000 1.6-16V 110 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
1.9 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 1998 1.9 D 70 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km+4%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 2003 2.0 S16 135 HP manual 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2001 2.0 HDI 90 HP manual 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+12%
1998 - 2002

Peugeot 206 1998 3 doors hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines30.8 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+13%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines47.7 MPG
4.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+6%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 206 1998 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Peugeot 206 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.2 litres per 100 km or 17% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Peugeot 206 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly better than average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 206 2000 1.6-16V 110 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 1998 1.1 60 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+10%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 1998 1.4 75 HP manual 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+10%
Peugeot 206 1999 1.4 75 HP automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+17%
1.4 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2002 1.4 HDI 68 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km+12%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 1998 1.6 90 HP manual 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+20%
Peugeot 206 2000 1.6 90 HP automatic 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Peugeot 206 2000 1.6-16V 110 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+8%
Peugeot 206 2000 1.6-16V 110 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
1.9 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 1998 1.9 D 70 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km+4%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 1999 GTI 2.0-16V 138 HP manual 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+13%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2001 2.0 HDI 90 HP manual 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+12%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.