Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Peugeot 206 2002 fuel consumption

Peugeot 206 from 2002 to 2007 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 13% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2002 Peugeot 206 average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2007 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became similar to average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersPeugeot 206All carmakersPeugeot 206
2002+6%+11% +7%+15%
Show all years
2003+6%+11% +8%+15%
2004+7%+11% +9%+16%
2005+8%+11% +10%+16%
2006+9%+11% +11%+16%
2007+11%+12% +12%+16%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Peugeot 206.

2002 - 2006

Peugeot 206 2002 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines32.0 MPG
7.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+13%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines43.0 MPG
5.5 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+16%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 206 2002 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 11% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Peugeot 206 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.2 litres per 100 km or 17% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Peugeot 206 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is average.
The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 206 2002 1.6-16V 110 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 2002 1.1 60 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+10%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 2002 1.4 75 HP manual 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+10%
Peugeot 206 2002 1.4 75 HP automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+19%
Peugeot 206 2003 1.4-16V 90 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+10%
1.4 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2002 1.4 HDI 68 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km+16%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 2002 1.6-16V 110 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+13%
Peugeot 206 2002 1.6-16V 110 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+17%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2004 1.6-16V HDiF 110 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+17%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2002 2.0 HDI 90 HP manual 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+16%
2002 - 2006

Peugeot 206 2002 3 doors hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines33.8 MPG
7.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines30.3 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+12%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+17%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 206 2002 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.5 liters per 100 km or 7% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Peugeot 206 with automatic transmission consumes around 1.1 litres per 100 km or 15% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Peugeot 206 advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 206 2002 GTI 2.0-16V 138 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Peugeot 206 with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 206 2002 2.0 HDI 90 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 2002 1.1 60 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+10%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 2002 1.4 75 HP manual 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+10%
Peugeot 206 2002 1.4 75 HP automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+19%
Peugeot 206 2003 1.4-16V 90 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+10%
1.4 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2002 1.4 HDI 68 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km+16%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 2002 1.6-16V 110 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+17%
Peugeot 206 2003 1.6-16V 110 HP manual 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+10%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2004 GTI 1.6-16V HDiF 110 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km+19%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 2002 GTI 2.0-16V 138 HP manual 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+8%
Peugeot 206 2003 2.0 RC 177 HP manual 27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km+10%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2002 2.0 HDI 90 HP manual 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+16%
2002 - 2007

Peugeot 206 2002 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines31.5 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+8%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines50.3 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines44.2 MPG
5.3 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+14%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Peugeot 206 2002 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.8 liters per 100 km or 12% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Peugeot 206 with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 4% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Peugeot 206 fuel economy is significantly above average. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 petrol engine and manual transmission (Peugeot 206 2002 SW 1.6-16V 110 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 2002 SW 1.1 60 HP manual 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+5%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 2002 SW 1.4 75 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+8%
Peugeot 206 2005 SW 1.4 75 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+11%
Peugeot 206 2003 SW 1.4-16V 90 HP manual 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+3%
1.4 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2002 SW 1.4 HDI 68 HP manual 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km+14%
Peugeot 206 2005 SW 1.4 HDI 68 HP manual 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km+14%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 2002 SW 1.6-16V 110 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+7%
Peugeot 206 2002 SW 1.6-16V 110 HP automatic 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+11%
Peugeot 206 2005 SW 1.6-16V 110 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+16%
Peugeot 206 2005 SW 1.6-16V 110 HP automatic 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+8%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2004 SW 1.6-16V HDiF 110 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+17%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Peugeot 206 2002 SW GTI 2.0-16V 138 HP manual 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+5%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Peugeot 206 2002 SW 2.0 HDI 90 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km+12%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.