Porsche Cayenne 2017 fuel consumption
Porsche Cayenne from 2017 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 27% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 26% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 28% higher. Since 2017 the Porsche Cayenne average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Porsche Cayenne | |||
| 2017 | +28% | +29% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2018 | +28% | +29% | ||
| 2019 | +28% | +29% | ||
| 2020 | +27% | +29% | ||
| 2021 | +26% | +29% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Porsche Cayenne.
2017
Porsche Cayenne 2017 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 19.9 MPG 11.8 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +29% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.9 liter petrol engine | ||
| Porsche Cayenne 2017 S 2.9 V6 440 HP 4x4 automatic | 19.9 MPG 11.8 l/100km |
|
| 3.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Porsche Cayenne 2017 3.0 V6 340 HP 4x4 automatic | 19.8 MPG 11.9 l/100km |
|
| 4.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Porsche Cayenne 2017 GTS 4.0 V8 460 HP 4x4 automatic | 25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km |
20.1 MPG 11.7 l/100km+29% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.