Renault Laguna 2010 fuel consumption
Renault Laguna from 2010 to 2013 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 16% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 14% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 18% higher. Starting from 2010 Renault Laguna average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2012 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Renault Laguna | All carmakers | Renault Laguna | |
| 2010 | +16% | +17% | +16% | +18% |
| Show all years | ||||
| 2011 | +19% | +17% | +19% | +18% |
| 2012 | +21% | +17% | +23% | +18% |
| 2013 | +23% | +17% | +27% | +18% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Renault Laguna.
2010 - 2013
Renault Laguna 2010 hatchback fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 28.9 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +17% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 43.0 MPG 5.5 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 35.4 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +22% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 liter diesel engine | ||
| Renault Laguna 2010 1.5 dCi 110 HP manual | 50.0 MPG 4.7 l/100km |
40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km+23% |
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Renault Laguna 2.0 140 HP manual | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km+20% |
| Renault Laguna 2010 2.0 170 HP automatic | 27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km+14% |
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Renault Laguna 2010 2.0 dCi 150 HP manual | 45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km+25% |
| Renault Laguna 2010 2.0 dCi 175 HP automatic | 37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+19% |
| Renault Laguna 2010 2.0 dCi 180 HP manual | 41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km |
34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+19% |
2010 - 2013
Renault Laguna 2010 wagon fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 28.9 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 24.8 MPG 9.5 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +17% |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 35.4 MPG 6.7 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +15% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 liter diesel engine | ||
| Renault Laguna 2010 Estate 1.5 dCi 110 HP manual | 39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km-2% |
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Renault Laguna 2010 Estate 2.0 140 HP manual | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km+20% |
| Renault Laguna 2010 Estate 2.0 170 HP automatic | 27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
23.8 MPG 9.9 l/100km+14% |
| 2.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Renault Laguna 2010 Estate 2.0 dCi 150 HP manual | 45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
36.2 MPG 6.5 l/100km+25% |
| Renault Laguna 2010 Estate 2.0 dCi 175 HP automatic | 37.3 MPG 6.3 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km+19% |
| Renault Laguna 2010 Estate 2.0 dCi GT 180 HP manual | 40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km |
34.6 MPG 6.8 l/100km+17% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.