Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Renault Megane 2013 fuel consumption

Renault Megane from 2013 to 2016 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 16% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 13% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 20% higher. Starting from 2013 Renault Megane average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2014 it was slightly above industry average, at 2015 difference became similar to average and finally at 2016 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became significantly higher than average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersRenault MeganeAll carmakersRenault Megane
2013+23%+37% +27%+38%
Show all years
2014+26%+28% +30%+36%
2015+27%+28% +33%+39%
2016+28%+34% +36%+41%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Renault Megane.

2013 - 2016

Renault Megane 2013 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines30.3 MPG
7.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+28%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines56.7 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+39%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Renault Megane 2013 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 20% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Renault Megane with automatic transmission consumes around 0.1 litres per 100 km or 2% less fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Renault Megane fuel economy is average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.5 diesel engine and automatic transmission (Renault Megane 2013 Estate 1.5 dCi 110 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Renault Megane with 1.5 diesel engine and manual transmission (Renault Megane 2013 Estate 1.5 dCi 110 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Renault Megane 2013 Estate 1.2 115 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+32%
Renault Megane 2013 Estate 1.2 130 HP manual 43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+41%
Renault Megane 2015 1.2 TCe 132 HP automatic 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+29%
1.5 liter diesel engine
Renault Megane 2013 Estate 1.5 dCi 95 HP manual 57.4 MPG
4.1 l/100km
44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km+29%
Renault Megane 2013 Estate 1.5 dCi 110 HP manual 67.2 MPG
3.5 l/100km
44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km+51%
Renault Megane 2013 Estate 1.5 dCi 110 HP automatic 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km+26%
Renault Megane 2015 1.5 Energy dCi 110 HP manual 67.2 MPG
3.5 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+54%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Renault Megane 2014 1.6 16V 110 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+7%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Renault Megane 2013 Estate 1.6 dCi 130 HP manual 58.8 MPG
4.0 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+45%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Renault Megane 2014 GT 2.0 TCe 220 HP manual 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km+32%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Renault Megane 2014 GT 2.0 dCi 165 HP manual 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+27%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.