Seat Cordoba 1996 fuel consumption
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
Year | Gasoline cars | Diesel cars | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
All carmakers | Seat Cordoba | All carmakers | Seat Cordoba | |
1996 | +4% | +3% | +2% | +7% |
Show all years | ||||
1997 | +3% | +3% | +3% | +5% |
1998 | +3% | +3% | +4% | +7% |
1999 | +3% | +3% | +5% | +10% |
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Seat Cordoba.
Seat Cordoba 1996 sedan fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.3 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 31.2 MPG 7.5 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +3% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 45.7 MPG 5.2 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 45.9 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
According to advertised fuel consumption, a Seat Cordoba 1996 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.5 liters per 100 km or 20% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.
Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Seat Cordoba fuel economy is significantly above average. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.9 diesel engine and manual transmission (Seat Cordoba 1997 1.9 TDi 110 HP).
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
Seat Cordoba 1996 1.4i 60 HP manual | 35.6 MPG 6.6 l/100km |
34.1 MPG 6.9 l/100km+5% |
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Seat Cordoba 1996 1.6i 75 HP manual | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km-1% |
Seat Cordoba 1997 1.6i 75 HP automatic | 25.8 MPG 9.1 l/100km |
|
Seat Cordoba 1996 1.6i 101 HP manual | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km+5% |
1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
Seat Cordoba 1996 1.8i 90 HP automatic | 25.6 MPG 9.2 l/100km |
|
1.9 liter diesel engine | ||
Seat Cordoba 1996 1.9 D 64 HP manual | 40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km |
40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km0% |
Seat Cordoba 1996 1.9 SDi 64 HP manual | 47.0 MPG 5.0 l/100km |
44.4 MPG 5.3 l/100km+6% |
Seat Cordoba 1996 1.9 TDi 90 HP manual | 48.0 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km+6% |
Seat Cordoba 1997 1.9 TDi 110 HP manual | 48.0 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
45.2 MPG 5.2 l/100km+6% |
2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Seat Cordoba 1996 2.0 GTi 116 HP manual | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
Seat Cordoba 1996 coupe fuel economy
Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.7 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.2 MPG 8.1 l/100km |
Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +3% |
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 48.5 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 42.4 MPG 5.6 l/100km |
Average real diesel consumption difference * | +14% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
---|---|---|
1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
Seat Cordoba 1997 SX 1.6i 75 HP manual | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km+4% |
Seat Cordoba 1997 SX 1.6i 75 HP manual | 30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km |
31.4 MPG 7.5 l/100km-1% |
Seat Cordoba 1996 SX 1.6i 101 HP manual | 30.2 MPG 7.8 l/100km |
28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km+5% |
1.8 liter petrol engine | ||
Seat Cordoba 1996 SX 1.8i 16V 129 HP manual | 28.7 MPG 8.2 l/100km |
|
1.9 liter diesel engine | ||
Seat Cordoba 1996 SX 1.9 TDi 90 HP manual | 48.0 MPG 4.9 l/100km |
43.6 MPG 5.4 l/100km+10% |
Seat Cordoba 1998 SX 1.9 TDi 110 HP manual | 49.0 MPG 4.8 l/100km |
41.3 MPG 5.7 l/100km+19% |
2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
Seat Cordoba 1996 SX 2.0i 116 HP manual | 29.8 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
|
Seat Cordoba 1996 SX 2.0i 16V 150 HP manual | 28.0 MPG 8.4 l/100km |
27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km+2% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.